linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for kunmap_flush_on_unmap()
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 21:56:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9L291ySSSRHD3uB@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9LqwvXy+gpFBerE@ZenIV>

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:04:02PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:48:03PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:38:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:33:46 +0100 "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > If ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_ON_KUNMAP is defined (PA-RISC case), __kunmap_local()
> > > > calls kunmap_flush_on_unmap(). The latter currently flushes the wrong
> > > > address (as confirmed by Matthew Wilcox and Helge Deller). Al Viro
> > > > proposed to call kunmap_flush_on_unmap() on an aligned-down to page
> > > > address in order to fix this issue. Consensus has been reached on this
> > > > solution.
> > > 
> > > What are the user-visible runtime effects of this flaw?
> > 
> > The version of this patch I sent out includes this information,
> > as well as the missed alignment for kunmap_atomic().
> 
> One point: AFAICS, the situation right now is
> 	* all callers of kunmap_local() pass page-aligned pointers

Ah, no.  kmap_local_folio() accepts a byte offset within the folio
and returns a pointer to that byte.  I hadn't noticed the parisc
case and thought it was already allowed to pass a misaligned pointer
to kunmap_local() since it is allowed for the highmem case.  It
simplified the callers, so it looked like a good tradeoff.

See, eg 338f379cf7c2:

-               src_addr = kmap_atomic(src_page);
-               dest_addr = kmap_atomic(dest_page);
+               src_addr = kmap_local_folio(src_folio,
+                                       offset_in_folio(src_folio, srcoff));
+               dst_addr = kmap_local_folio(dst_folio,
+                                       offset_in_folio(dst_folio, dstoff));

-               if (memcmp(src_addr + src_poff, dest_addr + dest_poff, cmp_len))
+               if (memcmp(src_addr, dst_addr, cmp_len))

-               kunmap_atomic(dest_addr);
-               kunmap_atomic(src_addr);
+               kunmap_local(dst_addr);
+               kunmap_local(src_addr);



  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-26 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 14:33 [PATCH] mm/highmem: Align-down to page the address for kunmap_flush_on_unmap() Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-26 19:50 ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-26 20:37   ` Helge Deller
2023-01-26 20:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-27 23:07       ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-26 20:53   ` Al Viro
2023-01-27 22:48     ` Ira Weiny
2023-01-26 20:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-27 17:58   ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-27 18:03     ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-26 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-26 20:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-26 21:04     ` Al Viro
2023-01-26 21:56       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-01-26 22:17         ` Al Viro
2023-01-27 23:13           ` Ira Weiny
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-26 14:11 Fabio M. De Francesco
2023-01-26 14:26 ` Fabio M. De Francesco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9L291ySSSRHD3uB@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).