From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:42:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEh4doXvyuRl5BDB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEefLYiX6rF3Uk4E@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:15:41AM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
< snip >
> > [...]
> > > +void dump_migrate_failure_pages(struct list_head *page_list)
> > > +{
> > > + DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor,
> > > + "migrate failure");
> > > + if (DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH(descriptor) &&
> > > + alloc_contig_ratelimit()) {
> > > + struct page *page;
> > > +
> > > + WARN(1, "failed callstack");
> > > + list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> > > + dump_page(page, "migration failure");
> > > + }
> >
> > Apart from the above, do we have to warn for something that is a
> > debugging aid? A similar concern wrt dump_page which uses pr_warn and
>
> Make sense.
>
> > page owner is using even pr_alert.
> > Would it make sense to add a loglevel parameter both into __dump_page
> > and dump_page_owner?
>
> Let me try it.
I looked though them and made first draft to clean them up.
It's bigger than my initial expectaion because there are many callsites
to use dump_page and stack_trace_print inconsistent loglevel.
Since it's not a specific problem for this work, I'd like to deal with
it as separate patchset since I don't want to be stuck on here for my
initial goal.
FYI,
Subject: [RFC 0/5] make dump_page aware of loglevel
- Forked from [1]
dump_page uses __dump_page and dump_page_owner internally to
print various information. However, their printk loglevel are
inconsistent in that
__dump_page: KERN_WARNING
__dump_page_owner: KERN_ALERT
stack_trace_print: KERN_DEFAULT
To make them consistent from dump_page, this patch introduces
pr_loglevel in printk and make the utility functions aware of
loglevel. Finally, last patch changes dump_page to support
loglevel to make the printing level consistent.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YEdAw6gnp9XxoWUQ@dhcp22.suse.cz/
Minchan Kim (5):
mm: introduce pr_loglevel for __dump_[page]_owner
stacktrace: stack_trace_print aware of loglevel
mm: page_owner: dump_page_owner aware of loglevel
mm: debug: __dump_page aware of loglevel
mm: debug: dump_page aware of loglevel
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 2 +-
drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c | 2 +-
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
include/linux/mmdebug.h | 10 ++++++----
include/linux/page_owner.h | 8 ++++----
include/linux/printk.h | 12 +++++++++++
include/linux/stacktrace.h | 4 ++--
kernel/backtracetest.c | 2 +-
kernel/dma/debug.c | 3 ++-
kernel/kcsan/report.c | 7 ++++---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ++-
kernel/stacktrace.c | 5 +++--
mm/debug.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/gup_test.c | 4 ++--
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++--
mm/kasan/report.c | 4 ++--
mm/kfence/report.c | 3 ++-
mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +-
mm/page_owner.c | 24 +++++++++++-----------
25 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-10 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 20:20 [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 21:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-08 22:29 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:41 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-03-09 2:23 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-09 2:21 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 0:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-09 0:30 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: page_alloc: alloc_contig_ratelimit() can be static kernel test robot
2021-03-09 9:32 ` [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 16:15 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 16:32 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 17:27 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 15:59 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 7:42 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2021-03-10 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-10 15:45 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 16:05 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 16:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 17:06 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 18:07 ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-10 13:54 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEh4doXvyuRl5BDB@google.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox