public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:42:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEh4doXvyuRl5BDB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEefLYiX6rF3Uk4E@google.com>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 08:15:41AM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:

< snip >

> > [...]
> > > +void dump_migrate_failure_pages(struct list_head *page_list)
> > > +{
> > > +	DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor,
> > > +			"migrate failure");
> > > +	if (DYNAMIC_DEBUG_BRANCH(descriptor) &&
> > > +			alloc_contig_ratelimit()) {
> > > +		struct page *page;
> > > +
> > > +		WARN(1, "failed callstack");
> > > +		list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> > > +			dump_page(page, "migration failure");
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Apart from the above, do we have to warn for something that is a
> > debugging aid? A similar concern wrt dump_page which uses pr_warn and
> 
> Make sense.
> 
> > page owner is using even pr_alert.
> > Would it make sense to add a loglevel parameter both into __dump_page
> > and dump_page_owner?
> 
> Let me try it.

I looked though them and made first draft to clean them up.

It's bigger than my initial expectaion because there are many callsites
to use dump_page and stack_trace_print inconsistent loglevel. 
Since it's not a specific problem for this work, I'd like to deal with
it as separate patchset since I don't want to be stuck on here for my
initial goal.

FYI,

Subject: [RFC 0/5] make dump_page aware of loglevel

- Forked from [1]

dump_page uses __dump_page and dump_page_owner internally to
print various information. However, their printk loglevel are
inconsistent in that

__dump_page: KERN_WARNING
__dump_page_owner: KERN_ALERT
        stack_trace_print: KERN_DEFAULT

To make them consistent from dump_page, this patch introduces
pr_loglevel in printk and make the utility functions aware of
loglevel. Finally, last patch changes dump_page to support
loglevel to make the printing level consistent.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YEdAw6gnp9XxoWUQ@dhcp22.suse.cz/

Minchan Kim (5):
  mm: introduce pr_loglevel for __dump_[page]_owner
  stacktrace: stack_trace_print aware of loglevel
  mm: page_owner: dump_page_owner aware of loglevel
  mm: debug: __dump_page aware of loglevel
  mm: debug: dump_page aware of loglevel
  drivers/md/dm-bufio.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c |  2 +-
 fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c       |  2 +-
 fs/fuse/dev.c               |  2 +-
 include/linux/mmdebug.h     | 10 ++++++----
 include/linux/page_owner.h  |  8 ++++----
 include/linux/printk.h      | 12 +++++++++++
 include/linux/stacktrace.h  |  4 ++--
 kernel/backtracetest.c      |  2 +-
 kernel/dma/debug.c          |  3 ++-
 kernel/kcsan/report.c       |  7 ++++---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c    |  3 ++-
 kernel/stacktrace.c         |  5 +++--
 mm/debug.c                  | 40 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 mm/filemap.c                |  2 +-
 mm/gup_test.c               |  4 ++--
 mm/huge_memory.c            |  4 ++--
 mm/kasan/report.c           |  4 ++--
 mm/kfence/report.c          |  3 ++-
 mm/kmemleak.c               |  2 +-
 mm/memory.c                 |  2 +-
 mm/memory_hotplug.c         |  4 ++--
 mm/page_alloc.c             |  4 ++--
 mm/page_isolation.c         |  2 +-
 mm/page_owner.c             | 24 +++++++++++-----------
 25 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08 20:20 [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Minchan Kim
2021-03-08 21:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-08 22:29   ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09  0:41     ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-03-09  2:23       ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09  0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2021-03-09  2:21   ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09  0:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-09  0:30 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: page_alloc: alloc_contig_ratelimit() can be static kernel test robot
2021-03-09  9:32 ` [PATCH v2] mm: page_alloc: dump migrate-failed pages Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 16:15   ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-09 16:32     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-09 17:27       ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:04         ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 15:59           ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10  7:42     ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2021-03-10  8:20       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-10 15:45         ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:07       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 16:05         ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 16:46           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-10 17:06             ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 18:07               ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-10 13:26   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-10 13:54     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEh4doXvyuRl5BDB@google.com \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=joaodias@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox