linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use hugetlb pages
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:59:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFMkbuUbsLti5P6a@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFMdlaXBGrZFRpQQ@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:29:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 18-03-21 09:54:01, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -2287,10 +2288,12 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page)
> >  		goto unlock;
> >  	} else if (page_count(old_page)) {
> >  		/*
> > -		 * Someone has grabbed the page, fail for now.
> > +		 * Someone has grabbed the page, try to isolate it here.
> > +		 * Fail with -EBUSY if not possible.
> >  		 */
> > -		ret = -EBUSY;
> >  		update_and_free_page(h, new_page);
> > +		if (!isolate_huge_page(old_page, list)
> > +			ret = -EBUSY;
> >  		goto unlock;
> >  	} else if (!HPageFreed(old_page)) {
> 
> I do not think you want to call isolate_huge_page with hugetlb_lock
> held. You would need to drop the lock before calling isolate_huge_page.

Yeah, that was an oversight. As I said I did not compile it(let alone
test it), otherwise the system would have screamed I guess.

I was more interested in knowing whether how did it look wrt. retry
concerns:

diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
index bcff86ca616f..a37b4ce86e58 100644
--- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ struct huge_bootmem_page {
 	struct hstate *hstate;
 };

-int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page);
+int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list);
 struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				unsigned long addr, int avoid_reserve);
 struct page *alloc_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
@@ -866,7 +866,8 @@ static inline void huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 #else	/* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 struct hstate {};

-static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page)
+static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page,
+						struct list_head *list)
 {
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 9f253fc3b4f9..6e47855fd154 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 		}

 		if (PageHuge(page) && cc->alloc_contig) {
-			ret = isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(page);
+			ret = isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(page, &cc->migratepages);

 			/*
 			 * Fail isolation in case isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page
@@ -927,6 +927,15 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 				goto isolate_fail;
 			}

+			if (PageHuge(page)) {
+				/*
+				 * Hugepage was successfully isolated and placed
+				 * on the cc->migratepages list.
+				 */
+				low_pfn += compound_nr(page) - 1;
+				goto isolate_success_no_list;
+			}
+
 			/*
 			 * Ok, the hugepage was dissolved. Now these pages are
 			 * Buddy and cannot be re-allocated because they are
@@ -1068,6 +1077,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,

 isolate_success:
 		list_add(&page->lru, &cc->migratepages);
+isolate_success_no_list:
 		cc->nr_migratepages += compound_nr(page);
 		nr_isolated += compound_nr(page);

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 3194c1bd9e32..f55fa6acc6f9 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2257,7 +2257,8 @@ static void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h,
  * Returns 0 on success, otherwise negated error.
  */

-static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page)
+static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
+					struct list_head *list)
 {
 	gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
 	int nid = page_to_nid(old_page);
@@ -2287,10 +2288,14 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page)
 		goto unlock;
 	} else if (page_count(old_page)) {
 		/*
-		 * Someone has grabbed the page, fail for now.
+		 * Someone has grabbed the page, try to isolate it here.
+		 * Fail with -EBUSY if not possible.
 		 */
-		ret = -EBUSY;
 		update_and_free_page(h, new_page);
+		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
+		if (!isolate_huge_page(old_page, list)
+			ret = -EBUSY;
+		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 		goto unlock;
 	} else if (!HPageFreed(old_page)) {
 		/*
@@ -2319,10 +2324,11 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page)
 	return ret;
 }

-int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page)
+int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct hstate *h;
 	struct page *head;
+	int ret = -EBUSY;

 	/*
 	 * The page might have been dissolved from under our feet, so make sure
@@ -2347,7 +2353,12 @@ int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page)
 	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
 		return -ENOMEM;

-	return alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(h, head);
+	if (page_count(head) && isolate_huge_page(head, list))
+		ret = 0;
+	else if (!page_count(head))
+		ret = alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(h, head, list);
+
+	return ret;
 }

 struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 562e87cbd7a1..42aaef30633e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1507,8 +1507,9 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
 	LIST_HEAD(clean_pages);

 	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, page_list, lru) {
-		if (page_is_file_lru(page) && !PageDirty(page) &&
-		    !__PageMovable(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+		if (!PageHuge(page) && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+		    !PageDirty(page) && !__PageMovable(page) &&
+		    !PageUnevictable(page)) {
 			ClearPageActive(page);
 			list_move(&page->lru, &clean_pages);
 		}


The spin_lock after the isolate_huge_page() in
alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page() could probably be spared by placing a
goto out directly before the return.
But just a POC.

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-18  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17 11:12 [PATCH v5 0/5] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] mm,page_alloc: Bail out earlier on -ENOMEM in alloc_contig_migrate_range Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 14:05   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 14:42     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-17 14:49       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18 11:04     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-18 11:37       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] mm,compaction: Let isolate_migratepages_{range,block} return error codes Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 14:12   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 14:38     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 14:59       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18  9:50         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-03-18 10:22           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18 11:10             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-03-18 11:36               ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19  9:57                 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-19 10:14                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-03-19 10:26                     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 14:22   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use " Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 14:26   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18  8:54     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-18  9:29       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18  9:59         ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2021-03-18 10:12           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] mm,page_alloc: Drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig Oscar Salvador
2021-03-17 11:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-17 14:31   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-17 14:36     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-17 15:03       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-18  8:44         ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-18  8:55           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFMkbuUbsLti5P6a@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).