From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3847DC43460 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB18611AB for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7EB18611AB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 07FDF6B006E; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:30:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 02EE06B0071; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:30:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E38FD6B0072; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:30:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0201.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BC26B006E for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82214181AEF15 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:30:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78125858916.03.5F4A75C Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BB74080F40 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=2uXGZMgNjoMdSplWtfJsG5vUGfYvRDuyRM1M9SbfwSQ=; b=KVL0hDRqSBHkJt1lxABY9cgPS/ xLpKjKfy5RCDAF4tgf31yw+hM0q8/bMefasxsDTN5NhFQtgcYwMyH7EIIBpLoz2ku/Ks1SudeKQrQ 1nZRGo0KuHjLYlX/e1WyPkc02OhKIAXLIOznk5QTbyqty2vUqcvcsK+vOjNjsvm6Gea4a2RVK2lxX DPSSzE/BOk5gstMuehmWxVlpKSdnwvX3CEgwXwHAJWOrSodu1ebp3jFDqxPrFdivj0xDkiu4vvDWy hd/n1ROE/PY8bEi7QU1J5JKmueiRKRldl2qx/DHw6REI+OnL7756HGc7oSb1OWiiyCOq3S1j20/Fx H2ulUXNw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lg8mS-006MME-Vz; Mon, 10 May 2021 16:29:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:29:16 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Matteo Croce Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Folio Prequel patches Message-ID: References: <20210430145549.2662354-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210510181245.15b4701e@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210510181245.15b4701e@linux.microsoft.com> Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=KVL0hDRq; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49BB74080F40 X-Stat-Signature: tjrow3dfthp35gdxdg771w7qn54yqy1s Received-SPF: none (infradead.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf17; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=casper.infradead.org; client-ip=90.155.50.34 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1620664212-460074 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:12:45PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote: > On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 15:55:41 +0100 > "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" wrote: > > > These patches have all been posted before and not picked up yet. I've > > built the folio patches on top of them; while they are not necessarily > > prerequisites in the conceptual sense, I'm not convinced that the > > folio patches will build without them. The nth_page patch is purely > > an efficiency question, while patch 5 ("Make compound_head > > const-preserving") is required for the current implementation of > > page_folio(). Patch 8 ("Fix struct page layout on 32-bit systems") > > is required for the struct folio layout to match struct page layout > > on said 32-bit systems (arm, mips, ppc). > > > > They are on top of next-20210430 > > > > I'm running them since a couple days on an arm64 machine which uses the > page_pool API. No issues so far. Thanks! Andrew picked up the first seven of these patches last night, and I resent the eighth one today: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210510153211.1504886-1-willy@infradead.org/