From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99796C48BE5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498AE61164 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:56:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 498AE61164 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C10C56B006C; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:56:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BE7A56B006E; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:56:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AAF8F6B0070; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:56:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0240.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.240]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1AF6B006C for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:56:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265F28249980 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:56:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78259433322.11.83C61C0 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993768019357 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:55:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=LEmL4MSSLLtvQqDbYrGd3H53NXZmD7Wlx6AM9cvbcpU=; b=h8s3zdc7eSQiPnzQtyZNylnz1D 0Vma+P3TwOJtBJOZiGzg3HdImCvFSQrq7Vf8CSzCzn3xcOsUCsapDWVA5Vpt/jYdnUrD/fKHXrXNd 1Epo+9OOELohVvt6To/5C/WBaEyR9vxcwPVJZF1Ypzi8QpPEycEiwhNTTxJNfZiS4mLYI0RfjuBYS xHgd0xQb7QegpJbr744r5+fHH6EWa2MrslDYPISIboS7+VoyTvYjupQnF7OkLwL8rUq1ZKAHGu8dO 3qBYaSktb3JGT0kyGVCovho3Yfc9E5liDxOxFSR7lTqtC0W3FFel48wVUeWvxVsLXkg4cAfwfnHCx irzQJ0iQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ltU8R-007zxo-9D; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:55:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 12:55:07 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: David Howells Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Vlastimil Babka , William Kucharski Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 26/33] mm/writeback: Add folio_wait_writeback() Message-ID: References: <20210614201435.1379188-27-willy@infradead.org> <20210614201435.1379188-1-willy@infradead.org> <815893.1623839446@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <815893.1623839446@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=h8s3zdc7; spf=none (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-Stat-Signature: d9myefonc19ksjateehez9g4o6hxt5x9 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 993768019357 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1623844550-718584 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:30:46AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > > > + struct page *page = &folio->page; > > Isn't that a layering violation? Should it be something like: > > struct page *page = folio_head(); > > or: > > struct page *page = folio_subpage(0); It's not a layering violation, but it is bad style. It indicates the function is incompletely converted to folios and probably isn't actually folio-safe. After about a dozen more commits, it's possible to finish the conversion in afs_page_mkwrite(), and I do so here: https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/commitdiff/f49f546f4ad83c8a6fec861af5f9d0825b850abc It's still not 100% clean as afs_page_dirty() expects a head|base page instead of a folio, so there's more cleanup required. Also trace_afs_page_dirty() continues to take a page instead of a folio, but that tends to not actually be a problem.