From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
syzbot+127fd7828d6eeb611703@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Avoid page allocator recursion with pagesets.lock held
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 18:05:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOcwWBJw4uZH8X3f@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOb5OrkqjWu4TODN@optiplex-fbsd>
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 09:10:18AM -0400, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > There are a number of ways it could be fixed. The page owner code could
> > be audited to strip GFP flags that allow sleeping but it'll impair the
> > functionality of PAGE_OWNER if allocations fail. The bulk allocator
> > could add a special case to release/reacquire the lock for prep_new_page
> > and lookup PCP after the lock is reacquired at the cost of performance.
> > The patches requiring prep could be tracked using the least significant
If we're nitpicking changelogs, then s/patches/pages/
> > bit and looping through the array although it is more complicated for
> > the list interface. The options are relatively complex and the second
> > one still incurs a performance penalty when PAGE_OWNER is active so this
> > patch takes the simple approach -- disable bulk allocation of PAGE_OWNER is
> ^^^^
> Minor nit: s/of/if
>
> > active. The caller will be forced to allocate one page at a time incurring
> > a performance penalty but PAGE_OWNER is already a performance penalty.
The thought occurs that all pages allocated this way will have the same
stack. Someone suitably motivated could:
- Refcount the stacks managed by page_owner
- Generate the stack in the caller of alloc_bulk
- Pass the stack in to a new __set_page_owner()
That's a lot of work; I'm not going to do it, and I don't think Mel
should either. But if someone's looking for something to do ...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-08 8:14 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Avoid page allocator recursion with pagesets.lock held Mel Gorman
2021-07-08 13:10 ` Rafael Aquini
2021-07-08 17:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOcwWBJw4uZH8X3f@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=syzbot+127fd7828d6eeb611703@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).