From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn,
jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn, zealci@zte.com.cn,
Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm/folio-compat.c: folio should not be NULL when it is referenced
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 02:05:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSL0S9SKjmt5gGuW@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823004735.32013-1-wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 08:47:35AM +0800, Yi Wang wrote:
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>
>
> A bug was found by coccinelle:
> folio is NULL but dereferenced
> Therefore,added a check to make sure 'folio' is not NULL.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Your robot is overzealous. This does not dereference folio; rather it
takes the address of the page element of the folio structure.
By a strict reading of the C spec, it is not allowed. However, GCC
(and I assume Clang) does the right thing.
> folio = __filemap_get_folio(mapping, index, fgp_flags, gfp);
> - if ((fgp_flags & FGP_HEAD) || !folio || xa_is_value(folio))
> - return &folio->page;
> + if ((fgp_flags & FGP_HEAD) || xa_is_value(folio))
> + if (folio != NULL)
> + return &folio->page;
> return folio_file_page(folio, index);
This is definitely wrong. Did you test it? I bet you get a NULL
pointer dereference if you try it.
You could potentially make the case for:
if (!folio)
return NULL;
if ((fgp_flags & FGP_HEAD) || xa_is_value(folio))
return &folio->page;
but you actually have the same problem with the C spec, that unless
folio is actually a pointer to a folio, then &folio->page is
_technically_ undefined. So it would have to be something even
more complex to be pedantically correct.
It's just not worth it. Fix your tool.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 0:47 [PATCH linux-next] mm/folio-compat.c: folio should not be NULL when it is referenced Yi Wang
2021-08-23 1:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSL0S9SKjmt5gGuW@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn \
--cc=jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wang.yi59@zte.com.cn \
--cc=xue.zhihong@zte.com.cn \
--cc=zealci@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).