From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE14C4338F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDDF61373 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:13:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8FDDF61373 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D58E56B006C; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:13:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D09B08D0001; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:13:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BF8316B0073; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:13:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0003.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28BF6B006C for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:13:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EF918030C7B for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:13:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78506387568.25.372E0E5 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678F86001998 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:13:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Eg3QxQOXcQlSwtgCd5SzXpkgE9m6OPw89KHTWSF2gk0=; b=WQ4XFyxU02pmjeV3yO5T17ebft rEgcM92zpKIKLaC9SoW79tWiTVLY8RFBDFk07Mj2ForFR864wFX2/AZD5Ax2WpKm2ykwVBHttAXTD w6IPLMYV0l7SIqCCt3YI/2bjXD4Coj2rn0+XEYTZbUd413vxgnlLxoSrEO3UnMcqxSFoOdkQ20IZG NF4EG5zTsjMGRINGiz2C+V5DBlDAjKXiYbNFLw1RjStS/yIHQB0EOXaw4d24oYetLR1hxcRPBlmKN kiK2iNTSPYA7vDUEvlpvjQuLo+FiAAc1XHk2mlFn/b9vurGdnNnS9Qy3X2dSnT8z9VD/fB+XEfDGX KVr4hWtA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mI9l6-009lHb-DE; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:13:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:13:00 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: unexport folio_add_lru Message-ID: References: <20210823124307.970182-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210823124307.970182-1-hch@lst.de> Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=WQ4XFyxU; spf=none (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 678F86001998 X-Stat-Signature: 4rkkya6wjz1mo75kf8ihq6x4yrcc8de6 X-HE-Tag: 1629724423-136448 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Only used in core mm code. Yes, but that's going to be true of virtually all the folio symbols which are wrapped in folio-compat.c. Perhaps we can give this one a year to see what the CIFS and FUSE folio conversions end up looking like?