From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Jordy Zomer <jordy@pwning.systems>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] secretmem: Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to zero
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:51:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXcKzKVX7NTAtvPh@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202110251225.D01841AE67@keescook>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:29:46PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:16:34PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > Commit 110860541f44 ("mm/secretmem: use refcount_t instead of atomic_t")
> > attempted to fix the problem of secretmem_users wrapping to zero and
> > allowing suspend once again. Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to
> > zero by forbidding new users if the number of users has wrapped from
> > positive to negative. This stops a long way short of reaching the
> > necessary 4 billion users, so there's no need to be clever with special
> > anti-wrap types or checking the return value from atomic_inc().
>
> I still prefer refcount_t here because it provides deterministic
> saturation, but the risk right now is so narrow ("don't hibernate"),
> I'm not going to fight for it. I think it'd be fine to use it initialized
> to 1, and have the removal check for == 0 as a failure state, which would
> deterministically cover the underflow case too.
I still think that's abusing the refcount_t pattern. refcount_t should
be for ... reference counts. Not these other things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 18:16 [PATCH] secretmem: Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to zero Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-10-25 19:29 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-25 19:51 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-10-25 21:04 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-25 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-25 22:30 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-25 23:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 0:17 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-26 1:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-10-26 1:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXcKzKVX7NTAtvPh@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jordy@pwning.systems \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).