Re: [PATCH v7 43/45] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver

Peter Gonda
2021-11-18T17:09:31Z

. and

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:34 PM Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 3:09 PM Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > SEV-SNP specification provides the guest a mechanisum to communicate with
>
> mechanism
>
> > the PSP without risk from a malicious hypervisor who wishes to read, alter,
> > drop or replay the messages sent. The driver uses snp_issue_guest_request()
> > to issue GHCB SNP_GUEST_REQUEST or SNP_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST NAE events to
> > submit the request to PSP.
> >
> > The PSP requires that all communication should be encrypted using key
> > specified through the platform_data.
> >
> > The userspace can use SNP_GET_REPORT ioctl() to query the guest
> > attestation report.
> >
> > See SEV-SNP spec section Guest Messages for more details.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/coco/sevguest.rst | 77 ++++
> > drivers/virt/Kconfig | 3 +
> > drivers/virt/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig | 9 +
> > drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Makefile | 2 +
> > drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c | 601 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.h | 98 +++++
> > include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h | 44 ++
> > 8 files changed, 835 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/coco/sevguest.rst
> > create mode 100644 drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.h
> > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/coco/sevguest.rst b/Documentation/virt/coco/sevguest.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..002c90946b8a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/coco/sevguest.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +===================================================================
> > +The Definitive SEV Guest API Documentation
> > +===================================================================
> > +
> > +1. General description
> > +======================
> > +
> > +The SEV API is a set of ioctls that are used by the guest or hypervisor
> > +to get or set certain aspect of the SEV virtual machine. The ioctls belong
> > +to the following classes:
> > +
> > + - Hypervisor ioctls: These query and set global attributes which affect the
> > + whole SEV firmware. These ioctl are used by platform provision tools.
> > +
> > + - Guest ioctls: These query and set attributes of the SEV virtual machine.
> > +
> > +2. API description
> > +==================
> > +
> > +This section describes ioctls that can be used to query or set SEV guests.
> > +For each ioctl, the following information is provided along with a
> > +description:
> > +
> > + Technology:
> > + which SEV techology provides this ioctl. sev, sev-es, sev-snp or all.
>
> technology
>
> > +
> > + Type:
> > + hypervisor or guest. The ioctl can be used inside the guest or the
> > + hypervisor.
> > +
> > + Parameters:
> > + what parameters are accepted by the ioctl.
> > +
> > + Returns:
> > + the return value. General error numbers (ENOMEM, EINVAL)
> > + are not detailed, but errors with specific meanings are.
> > +
> > +The guest ioctl should be issued on a file descriptor of the /dev/sev-guest device.
> > +The ioctl accepts struct snp_user_guest_request. The input and output structure is
> > +specified through the req_data and resp_data field respectively. If the ioctl fails
> > +to execute due to a firmware error, then fw_err code will be set.
>
> Should way say what it will be set to? Also Sean pointed out on CCP
> driver that 0 is strange to set the error to, its a uint so we cannot
> do -1 like we did there. What about all FFs?
>
> > +
> > +::
> > + struct snp_guest_request_ioctl {
> > + /* Request and response structure address */
> > + __u64 req_data;
> > + __u64 resp_data;
> > +
> > + /* firmware error code on failure (see psp-sev.h) */
> > + __u64 fw_err;
> > + };
> > +
> > +2.1 SNP_GET_REPORT
> > +------------------
> > +
> > +:Technology: sev-snp
> > +:Type: guest ioctl
> > +:Parameters (in): struct snp_report_req
> > +:Returns (out): struct snp_report_resp on success, -negative on error
> > +
> > +The SNP_GET_REPORT ioctl can be used to query the attestation report from the
> > +SEV-SNP firmware. The ioctl uses the SNP_GUEST_REQUEST (MSG_REPORT_REQ) command
> > +provided by the SEV-SNP firmware to query the attestation report.
> > +
> > +On success, the snp_report_resp.data will contains the report. The report
>
> contain
>
> > +will contain the format described in the SEV-SNP specification. See the SEV-SNP
> > +specification for further details.
> > +
> > +
> > +Reference
> > +---------
> > +
> > +SEV-SNP and GHCB specification: developer.amd.com/sev
> > +
> > +The driver is based on SEV-SNP firmware spec 0.9 and GHCB spec version 2.0.
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
> > index 8061e8ef449f..e457e47610d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virt/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/Kconfig
> > @@ -36,4 +36,7 @@ source "drivers/virt/vboxguest/Kconfig"
> > source "drivers/virt/nitro_enclaves/Kconfig"
> >
> > source "drivers/virt/acrn/Kconfig"
> > +
> > +source "drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig"
> > +
> > endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/Makefile b/drivers/virt/Makefile
> > index 3e272ea60cd9..9c704a6fdcda 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virt/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/Makefile
> > @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ obj-y += vboxguest/
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_NITRO_ENCLAVES) += nitro_enclaves/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ACRN_HSM) += acrn/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SEV_GUEST) += coco/sevguest/
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..96190919cca8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +config SEV_GUEST
> > + tristate "AMD SEV Guest driver"
> > + default y
> > + depends on AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT && CRYPTO_AEAD2
> > + help
> > + The driver can be used by the SEV-SNP guest to communicate with the PSP to
> > + request the attestation report and more.
> > +
> > + If you choose 'M' here, this module will be called sevguest.
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Makefile b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b1ffb2b4177b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SEV_GUEST) += sevguest.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..982714c1b4ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,601 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) guest request interface
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > +#include <linux/set_memory.h>
> > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <crypto/aead.h>
> > +#include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> > +#include <linux/psp-sev.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/sev-guest.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/psp-sev.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/svm.h>
> > +#include <asm/sev.h>
> > +
> > +#include "sevguest.h"
> > +
> > +#define DEVICE_NAME "sev-guest"
> > +#define AAD_LEN 48
> > +#define MSG_HDR_VER 1
> > +
> > +struct snp_guest_crypto {
> > + struct crypto_aead *tfm;
> > + u8 *iv, *authtag;
> > + int iv_len, a_len;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct snp_guest_dev {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct miscdevice misc;
> > +
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg *request, *response;
> > + struct snp_secrets_page_layout *layout;
> > + struct snp_req_data input;
> > + u32 *os_area_msg_seqno;
> > + u8 *vmpck;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u32 vmpck_id;
> > +module_param(vmpck_id, uint, 0444);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(vmpck_id, "The VMPCK ID to use when communicating with the PSP.");
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(snp_cmd_mutex);
> > +
> > +static bool is_vmpck_empty(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
> > +{
> > + char zero_key[VMPCK_KEY_LEN] = {0};
> > +
> > + if (snp_dev->vmpck)
> > + return memcmp(snp_dev->vmpck, zero_key, VMPCK_KEY_LEN) == 0;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void snp_disable_vmpck(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
> > +{
> > + memzero_explicit(snp_dev->vmpck, VMPCK_KEY_LEN);
> > + snp_dev->vmpck = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u64 __snp_get_msg_seqno(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
> > +{
> > + u64 count;
>
> I may be overly paranoid here but how about
> `lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);` when writing or reading
> directly from this data?
>
> > +
> > + /* Read the current message sequence counter from secrets pages */
> > + count = *snp_dev->os_area_msg_seqno;
> > +
> > + return count + 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Return a non-zero on success */
> > +static u64 snp_get_msg_seqno(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
> > +{
> > + u64 count = __snp_get_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The message sequence counter for the SNP guest request is a 64-bit
> > + * value but the version 2 of GHCB specification defines a 32-bit storage
> > + * for the it. If the counter exceeds the 32-bit value then return zero.
>
> "for it. ..." or maybe "defines 32-bit field for the sequence counter"
>
> > + * The caller should check the return value, but if the caller happen to
>
> happens
>
> > + * not check the value and use it, then the firmware treats zero as an
> > + * invalid number and will fail the message request.
> > + */
> > + if (count >= UINT_MAX) {
> > + pr_err_ratelimited("SNP guest request message sequence counter overflow\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void snp_inc_msg_seqno(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * The counter is also incremented by the PSP, so increment it by 2
> > + * and save in secrets page.
> > + */
> > + *snp_dev->os_area_msg_seqno += 2;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct snp_guest_dev *to_snp_dev(struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + struct miscdevice *dev = file->private_data;
> > +
> > + return container_of(dev, struct snp_guest_dev, misc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct snp_guest_crypto *init_crypto(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u8 *key, size_t keylen)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto;
> > +
> > + crypto = kzalloc(sizeof(*crypto), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > + if (!crypto)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + crypto->tfm = crypto_alloc_aead("gcm(aes)", 0, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(crypto->tfm))
> > + goto e_free;
> > +
> > + if (crypto_aead_setkey(crypto->tfm, key, keylen))
> > + goto e_free_crypto;
> > +
> > + crypto->iv_len = crypto_aead_ivsize(crypto->tfm);
> > + if (crypto->iv_len < 12) {
> > + dev_err(snp_dev->dev, "IV length is less than 12.\n");
> > + goto e_free_crypto;
> > + }
> > +
> > + crypto->iv = kmalloc(crypto->iv_len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > + if (!crypto->iv)
> > + goto e_free_crypto;
> > +
> > + if (crypto_aead_authsize(crypto->tfm) > MAX_AUTHTAG_LEN) {
> > + if (crypto_aead_setauthsize(crypto->tfm, MAX_AUTHTAG_LEN)) {
> > + dev_err(snp_dev->dev, "failed to set authsize to %d\n", MAX_AUTHTAG_LEN);
> > + goto e_free_crypto;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + crypto->a_len = crypto_aead_authsize(crypto->tfm);
> > + crypto->authtag = kmalloc(crypto->a_len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > + if (!crypto->authtag)
> > + goto e_free_crypto;
> > +
> > + return crypto;
> > +
> > +e_free_crypto:
> > + crypto_free_aead(crypto->tfm);
> > +e_free:
> > + kfree(crypto->iv);
> > + kfree(crypto->authtag);
> > + kfree(crypto);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void deinit_crypto(struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto)
> > +{
> > + crypto_free_aead(crypto->tfm);
> > + kfree(crypto->iv);
> > + kfree(crypto->authtag);
> > + kfree(crypto);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int enc_dec_message(struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto, struct snp_guest_msg *msg,
> > + u8 *src_buf, u8 *dst_buf, size_t len, bool enc)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *hdr = &msg->hdr;
> > + struct scatterlist src[3], dst[3];
> > + DECLARE_CRYPTO_WAIT(wait);
> > + struct aead_request *req;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + req = aead_request_alloc(crypto->tfm, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!req)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * AEAD memory operations:
> > + * +------ AAD -------+------- DATA -----+---- AUTHTAG----+
> > + * | msg header | plaintext | hdr->authtag |
> > + * | bytes 30h - 5Fh | or | |
> > + * | | cipher | |
> > + * +------------------+------------------+----------------+
> > + */
> > + sg_init_table(src, 3);
> > + sg_set_buf(&src[0], &hdr->algo, AAD_LEN);
> > + sg_set_buf(&src[1], src_buf, hdr->msg_sz);
> > + sg_set_buf(&src[2], hdr->authtag, crypto->a_len);
> > +
> > + sg_init_table(dst, 3);
> > + sg_set_buf(&dst[0], &hdr->algo, AAD_LEN);
> > + sg_set_buf(&dst[1], dst_buf, hdr->msg_sz);
> > + sg_set_buf(&dst[2], hdr->authtag, crypto->a_len);
> > +
> > + aead_request_set_ad(req, AAD_LEN);
> > + aead_request_set_tfm(req, crypto->tfm);
> > + aead_request_set_callback(req, 0, crypto_req_done, &wait);
> > +
> > + aead_request_set_crypt(req, src, dst, len, crypto->iv);
> > + ret = crypto_wait_req(enc ? crypto_aead_encrypt(req) : crypto_aead_decrypt(req), &wait);
> > +
> > + aead_request_free(req);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __enc_payload(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_msg *msg,
> > + void *plaintext, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto = snp_dev->crypto;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *hdr = &msg->hdr;
> > +
> > + memset(crypto->iv, 0, crypto->iv_len);
> > + memcpy(crypto->iv, &hdr->msg_seqno, sizeof(hdr->msg_seqno));
> > +
> > + return enc_dec_message(crypto, msg, plaintext, msg->payload, len, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int dec_payload(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_msg *msg,
> > + void *plaintext, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto = snp_dev->crypto;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *hdr = &msg->hdr;
> > +
> > + /* Build IV with response buffer sequence number */
> > + memset(crypto->iv, 0, crypto->iv_len);
> > + memcpy(crypto->iv, &hdr->msg_seqno, sizeof(hdr->msg_seqno));
> > +
> > + return enc_dec_message(crypto, msg, msg->payload, plaintext, len, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int verify_and_dec_payload(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, void *payload, u32 sz)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto = snp_dev->crypto;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg *resp = snp_dev->response;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg *req = snp_dev->request;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *req_hdr = &req->hdr;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *resp_hdr = &resp->hdr;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(snp_dev->dev, "response [seqno %lld type %d version %d sz %d]\n",
> > + resp_hdr->msg_seqno, resp_hdr->msg_type, resp_hdr->msg_version, resp_hdr->msg_sz);
> > +
> > + /* Verify that the sequence counter is incremented by 1 */
> > + if (unlikely(resp_hdr->msg_seqno != (req_hdr->msg_seqno + 1)))
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > + /* Verify response message type and version number. */
> > + if (resp_hdr->msg_type != (req_hdr->msg_type + 1) ||
> > + resp_hdr->msg_version != req_hdr->msg_version)
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If the message size is greater than our buffer length then return
> > + * an error.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely((resp_hdr->msg_sz + crypto->a_len) > sz))
> > + return -EBADMSG;
> > +
> > + /* Decrypt the payload */
> > + return dec_payload(snp_dev, resp, payload, resp_hdr->msg_sz + crypto->a_len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool enc_payload(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 seqno, int version, u8 type,
> > + void *payload, size_t sz)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_msg *req = snp_dev->request;
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr *hdr = &req->hdr;
> > +
> > + memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req));
> > +
> > + hdr->algo = SNP_AEAD_AES_256_GCM;
> > + hdr->hdr_version = MSG_HDR_VER;
> > + hdr->hdr_sz = sizeof(*hdr);
> > + hdr->msg_type = type;
> > + hdr->msg_version = version;
> > + hdr->msg_seqno = seqno;
> > + hdr->msg_vmpck = vmpck_id;
> > + hdr->msg_sz = sz;
> > +
> > + /* Verify the sequence number is non-zero */
> > + if (!hdr->msg_seqno)
> > + return -ENOSR;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(snp_dev->dev, "request [seqno %lld type %d version %d sz %d]\n",
> > + hdr->msg_seqno, hdr->msg_type, hdr->msg_version, hdr->msg_sz);
> > +
> > + return __enc_payload(snp_dev, req, payload, sz);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int handle_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 exit_code, int msg_ver,
> > + u8 type, void *req_buf, size_t req_sz, void *resp_buf,
> > + u32 resp_sz, __u64 *fw_err)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long err;
> > + u64 seqno;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + /* Get message sequence and verify that its a non-zero */
> > + seqno = snp_get_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
> > + if (!seqno)
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + memset(snp_dev->response, 0, sizeof(*snp_dev->response));
> > +
> > + /* Encrypt the userspace provided payload */
> > + rc = enc_payload(snp_dev, seqno, msg_ver, type, req_buf, req_sz);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + /* Call firmware to process the request */
> > + rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err);
>
> Isn't everything in the file going to be calling this with
> SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST because they are all placing guest
> requests? If so, why not drop the @exit_code parameter and just
> hardcode SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST here?

Oops I see we use SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST and
SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST, nevermind here.

>
> > + if (fw_err)
> > + *fw_err = err;
> > +
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > +
> > + rc = verify_and_dec_payload(snp_dev, resp_buf, resp_sz);
> > + if (rc) {
> > + /*
> > + * The verify_and_dec_payload() will fail only if the hypervisor is
> > + * actively modifiying the message header or corrupting the encrypted payload.
> modifiying
> > + * This hints that hypervisor is acting in a bad faith. Disable the VMPCK so that
> > + * the key cannot be used for any communication.
> > + */
>
> This looks great, thanks for changes Brijesh. Should we mention in
> comment here or at snp_disable_vmpck() the AES-GCM issues with
> continuing to use the key? Or will future updaters to this code
> understand already?
>
>
> > + dev_alert(snp_dev->dev,
> > + "Detected unexpected decode failure, disabling the vmpck_id %d\n", vmpck_id);
> > + snp_disable_vmpck(snp_dev);
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Increment to new message sequence after payload descryption was successful. */
> > + snp_inc_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_report(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_request_ioctl *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_crypto *crypto = snp_dev->crypto;
> > + struct snp_report_resp *resp;
> > + struct snp_report_req req;
> > + int rc, resp_len;
> > +
> > + if (!arg->req_data || !arg->resp_data)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* Copy the request payload from userspace */
> > + if (copy_from_user(&req, (void __user *)arg->req_data, sizeof(req)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + /* Message version must be non-zero */
> > + if (!req.msg_version)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The intermediate response buffer is used while decrypting the
> > + * response payload. Make sure that it has enough space to cover the
> > + * authtag.
> > + */
> > + resp_len = sizeof(resp->data) + crypto->a_len;
> > + resp = kzalloc(resp_len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > + if (!resp)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* Issue the command to get the attestation report */
> > + rc = handle_guest_request(snp_dev, SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST, req.msg_version,
> > + SNP_MSG_REPORT_REQ, &req.user_data, sizeof(req.user_data),
> > + resp->data, resp_len, &arg->fw_err);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto e_free;
> > +
> > + /* Copy the response payload to userspace */
> > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg->resp_data, resp, sizeof(*resp)))
> > + rc = -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +e_free:
> > + kfree(resp);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static long snp_guest_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev = to_snp_dev(file);
> > + void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> > + struct snp_guest_request_ioctl input;
> > + int ret = -ENOTTY;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&input, argp, sizeof(input)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + input.fw_err = 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
> > +
> > + /* Check if the VMPCK is not empty */
> > + if (is_vmpck_empty(snp_dev)) {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(snp_dev->dev, "VMPCK is disabled\n");
> > + mutex_unlock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
> > + return -ENOTTY;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (ioctl) {
> > + case SNP_GET_REPORT:
> > + ret = get_report(snp_dev, &input);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
> > +
> > + if (input.fw_err && copy_to_user(argp, &input, sizeof(input)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_shared_pages(void *buf, size_t sz)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int npages = PAGE_ALIGN(sz) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + if (!buf)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* If fail to restore the encryption mask then leak it. */
> > + if (WARN_ONCE(set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)buf, npages),
> > + "Failed to restore encryption mask (leak it)\n"))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + __free_pages(virt_to_page(buf), get_order(sz));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void *alloc_shared_pages(size_t sz)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int npages = PAGE_ALIGN(sz) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT, get_order(sz));
> > + if (IS_ERR(page))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + ret = set_memory_decrypted((unsigned long)page_address(page), npages);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("SEV-SNP: failed to mark page shared, ret=%d\n", ret);
> > + __free_pages(page, get_order(sz));
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
>
> No strong preference or anything just curious. Why not allocate from
> SWIOTLB or use the DMA pool that supports decrypted memory:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/14/1508.
>
>
> > +
> > + return page_address(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct file_operations snp_guest_fops = {
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .unlocked_ioctl = snp_guest_ioctl,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u8 *get_vmpck(int id, struct snp_secrets_page_layout *layout, u32 **seqno)
> > +{
> > + u8 *key = NULL;
> > +
> > + switch (id) {
> > + case 0:
> > + *seqno = &layout->os_area.msg_seqno_0;
> > + key = layout->vmpck0;
> > + break;
> > + case 1:
> > + *seqno = &layout->os_area.msg_seqno_1;
> > + key = layout->vmpck1;
> > + break;
> > + case 2:
> > + *seqno = &layout->os_area.msg_seqno_2;
> > + key = layout->vmpck2;
> > + break;
> > + case 3:
> > + *seqno = &layout->os_area.msg_seqno_3;
> > + key = layout->vmpck3;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return key;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init snp_guest_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_secrets_page_layout *layout;
> > + struct snp_guest_platform_data *data;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev;
> > + struct miscdevice *misc;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!dev->platform_data)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + data = (struct snp_guest_platform_data *)dev->platform_data;
> > + layout = (__force void *)ioremap_encrypted(data->secrets_gpa, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (!layout)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + snp_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct snp_guest_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!snp_dev)
> > + goto e_fail;
> > +
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + snp_dev->vmpck = get_vmpck(vmpck_id, layout, &snp_dev->os_area_msg_seqno);
> > + if (!snp_dev->vmpck) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "invalid vmpck id %d\n", vmpck_id);
> > + goto e_fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Verify that VMPCK is not zero. */
> > + if (is_vmpck_empty(snp_dev)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "vmpck id %d is null\n", vmpck_id);
> > + goto e_fail;
> > + }
> > +
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, snp_dev);
> > + snp_dev->dev = dev;
> > + snp_dev->layout = layout;
> > +
> > + /* Allocate the shared page used for the request and response message. */
> > + snp_dev->request = alloc_shared_pages(sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > + if (!snp_dev->request)
> > + goto e_fail;
> > +
> > + snp_dev->response = alloc_shared_pages(sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > + if (!snp_dev->response)
> > + goto e_fail;
> > +
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + snp_dev->crypto = init_crypto(snp_dev, snp_dev->vmpck, VMPCK_KEY_LEN);
> > + if (!snp_dev->crypto)
> > + goto e_fail;
> > +
> > + misc = &snp_dev->misc;
> > + misc->minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
> > + misc->name = DEVICE_NAME;
> > + misc->fops = &snp_guest_fops;
> > +
> > + /* initial the input address for guest request */
> > + snp_dev->input.req_gpa = __pa(snp_dev->request);
> > + snp_dev->input.resp_gpa = __pa(snp_dev->response);
> > +
> > + ret = misc_register(misc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto e_fail;
> > +
> > + dev_info(dev, "Initialized SNP guest driver (using vmpck_id %d)\n", vmpck_id);
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +e_fail:
> > + iounmap(layout);
> > + free_shared_pages(snp_dev->request, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > + free_shared_pages(snp_dev->response, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __exit snp_guest_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + free_shared_pages(snp_dev->request, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > + free_shared_pages(snp_dev->response, sizeof(struct snp_guest_msg));
> > + deinit_crypto(snp_dev->crypto);
> > + misc_deregister(&snp_dev->misc);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver snp_guest_driver = {
> > + .remove = __exit_p(snp_guest_remove),
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "snp-guest",
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver_probe(snp_guest_driver, snp_guest_probe);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_VERSION("1.0.0");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AMD SNP Guest Driver");
> > diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.h b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..cfa76cf8a21a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> > + *
> > + * SEV-SNP API spec is available at https://developer.amd.com/sev
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __LINUX_SEVGUEST_H_
> > +#define __LINUX_SEVGUEST_H_
> > +
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#define MAX_AUTHTAG_LEN 32
> > +
> > +/* See SNP spec SNP_GUEST_REQUEST section for the structure */
> > +enum msg_type {
> > + SNP_MSG_TYPE_INVALID = 0,
> > + SNP_MSG_CPUID_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_CPUID_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_KEY_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_KEY_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_REPORT_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_REPORT_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_EXPORT_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_EXPORT_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_IMPORT_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_IMPORT_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_ABSORB_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_ABSORB_RSP,
> > + SNP_MSG_VMRK_REQ,
> > + SNP_MSG_VMRK_RSP,
>
> Did you want to include MSG_ABSORB_NOMA_REQ and MSG_ABSORB_NOMA_RESP here?
>
>
> > +
> > + SNP_MSG_TYPE_MAX
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum aead_algo {
> > + SNP_AEAD_INVALID,
> > + SNP_AEAD_AES_256_GCM,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct snp_guest_msg_hdr {
> > + u8 authtag[MAX_AUTHTAG_LEN];
> > + u64 msg_seqno;
> > + u8 rsvd1[8];
> > + u8 algo;
> > + u8 hdr_version;
> > + u16 hdr_sz;
> > + u8 msg_type;
> > + u8 msg_version;
> > + u16 msg_sz;
> > + u32 rsvd2;
> > + u8 msg_vmpck;
> > + u8 rsvd3[35];
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +struct snp_guest_msg {
> > + struct snp_guest_msg_hdr hdr;
> > + u8 payload[4000];
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The secrets page contains 96-bytes of reserved field that can be used by
> > + * the guest OS. The guest OS uses the area to save the message sequence
> > + * number for each VMPCK.
> > + *
> > + * See the GHCB spec section Secret page layout for the format for this area.
> > + */
> > +struct secrets_os_area {
> > + u32 msg_seqno_0;
> > + u32 msg_seqno_1;
> > + u32 msg_seqno_2;
> > + u32 msg_seqno_3;
> > + u64 ap_jump_table_pa;
> > + u8 rsvd[40];
> > + u8 guest_usage[32];
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +#define VMPCK_KEY_LEN 32
> > +
> > +/* See the SNP spec version 0.9 for secrets page format */
> > +struct snp_secrets_page_layout {
> > + u32 version;
> > + u32 imien : 1,
> > + rsvd1 : 31;
> > + u32 fms;
> > + u32 rsvd2;
> > + u8 gosvw[16];
> > + u8 vmpck0[VMPCK_KEY_LEN];
> > + u8 vmpck1[VMPCK_KEY_LEN];
> > + u8 vmpck2[VMPCK_KEY_LEN];
> > + u8 vmpck3[VMPCK_KEY_LEN];
> > + struct secrets_os_area os_area;
> > + u8 rsvd3[3840];
> > +} __packed;
> > +
> > +#endif /* __LINUX_SNP_GUEST_H__ */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h b/include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..eda7edcffda8
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sev-guest.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> > +/*
> > + * Userspace interface for AMD SEV and SEV-SNP guest driver.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> > + *
> > + * SEV API specification is available at: https://developer.amd.com/sev/
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __UAPI_LINUX_SEV_GUEST_H_
> > +#define __UAPI_LINUX_SEV_GUEST_H_
> > +
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +struct snp_report_req {
> > + /* message version number (must be non-zero) */
> > + __u8 msg_version;
> > +
> > + /* user data that should be included in the report */
> > + __u8 user_data[64];
>
> Are we missing the 'vmpl' field here? Does those default all requests
> to be signed with VMPL0? Users might want to change that, they could
> be using a paravisor.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct snp_report_resp {
> > + /* response data, see SEV-SNP spec for the format */
> > + __u8 data[4000];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct snp_guest_request_ioctl {
> > + /* Request and response structure address */
> > + __u64 req_data;
> > + __u64 resp_data;
> > +
> > + /* firmware error code on failure (see psp-sev.h) */
> > + __u64 fw_err;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define SNP_GUEST_REQ_IOC_TYPE 'S'
> > +
> > +/* Get SNP attestation report */
> > +#define SNP_GET_REPORT _IOWR(SNP_GUEST_REQ_IOC_TYPE, 0x0, struct snp_guest_request_ioctl)
> > +
> > +#endif /* __UAPI_LINUX_SEV_GUEST_H_ */
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >