From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
wangzhigang17@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp_page
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:07:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YeCUiO7RBqo/VTMh@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjv+beg2gRNdERANGfaGcqwDzzVD5RDD07FcrE5c6k-XA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:44:04AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> IOW, the COW path would do
>
> trylock - copy if fails
> try to remove from swap cache
> if page_count() is now 1, we can reuse it
>
> Note how the "try to remove from swap cache" is entirely independent
> of whether we then reuse it or not.
>
> And yes, we can have optimistic other tests - like not even bothering
> to trylock if we can see that the page-count is so elevated that it
> makes no difference and trying to remove from swap cache would be just
> pointless extra work (both the removal itself, and then potentially
> later re-additions).
>
> But those should be seen for what they are - not important for
> semantics, only a "don't bother, this page has so many users that we
> already know that removing the swapcache one doesn't make any
> difference at all".
I think what you mean is something like ...
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3290,15 +3290,13 @@ static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (PageAnon(vmf->page)) {
struct page *page = vmf->page;
- /* PageKsm() doesn't necessarily raise the page refcount */
- if (PageKsm(page) || page_count(page) != 1)
+ /* Lots of people are using this page, just copy */
+ if (page_count(page) > 5)
goto copy;
if (!trylock_page(page))
goto copy;
- if (PageKsm(page) || page_mapcount(page) != 1 || page_count(page) != 1) {
- unlock_page(page);
- goto copy;
- }
+ if (!reuse_swap_page(page, NULL))
+ goto unlock;
/*
* Ok, we've got the only map reference, and the only
* page count reference, and the page is locked,
@@ -3311,6 +3309,8 @@ static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
(VM_WRITE|VM_SHARED))) {
return wp_page_shared(vmf);
}
+unlock:
+ unlock_page(page);
copy:
/*
* Ok, we need to copy. Oh, well..
... with a suitably sensible reuse_swap_page().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 14:03 [PATCH] mm: reuse the unshared swapcache page in do_wp_page Liang Zhang
2022-01-13 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-13 14:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 15:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-13 15:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 16:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 17:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 17:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-13 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-13 21:07 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-01-13 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-14 5:00 ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-14 11:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-17 2:11 ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-17 12:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-17 13:31 ` zhangliang (AG)
2022-01-20 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 14:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 15:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 16:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 16:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-20 15:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-01-20 17:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 17:48 ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 18:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 18:11 ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 18:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 19:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-20 20:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-20 20:46 ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 20:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-21 9:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-21 17:43 ` Nadav Amit
2022-01-20 20:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-14 3:29 ` zhangliang (AG)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YeCUiO7RBqo/VTMh@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangzhigang17@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).