From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92D2C433F5 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3B35A6B0072; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 04:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 33BF36B0073; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 04:50:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1DCDB6B0074; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 04:50:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0060.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.60]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091676B0072 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 04:50:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0A3181C9901 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:50:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79028423628.08.96405E0 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5CF2000C for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F61061EA3; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11901C36AEA; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:50:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642153852; bh=qPzNVCCoAO7JZYE7iYAZoPJpbmPs2eM2hLzOcfDeZ5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NNt1sa9GkIaJprmWQxUHodyPtEBvTEBvTU5VRbhBXxfMfnCbS0h6hvDUpkUrURMXC 6ocweaUvLEmsf0P+Uf0vOQQtOel7bvY6Kxp17F/bAZNWVgP+C5ktQqc7E6dZ27dars IyLHg4K7IIpT2fbjLY/8JOCXD5JpTU+5HFLFMopmssk26sY5EH3JNfOSRX3+R6ca+z 48j83R/ZrFCvEIVOep9QDtPjd2WkwmOZf/jiSahxaIR1ecvBYMPpHcrQydOTc4DMy5 l538BfzFVnBh6pKbN5fNa//79MGVfqSPR++qLGX++FI41Nhf7fnx8zdrbtTtYZlLt/ jVqPuAmOdEXXQ== Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:50:42 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Martin Fernandez Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, ardb@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com, hughsient@gmail.com, alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com, alison.schofield@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Message-ID: References: <20220113213027.457282-1-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com> <20220113213027.457282-2-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220113213027.457282-2-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com> Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=NNt1sa9G; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 139.178.84.217 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org X-Stat-Signature: dkbrboxjnpwaywsgmjtzui1owyus81wh X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3F5CF2000C X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-HE-Tag: 1642153854-683137 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 06:30:23PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote: > Add the capability to mark regions of the memory memory_type able of > hardware memory encryption. > > Also add the capability to query if all regions of a memory node are > able to do hardware memory encryption to call it when initializing the > nodes. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 5 ++++ > mm/memblock.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index 9dc7cb239d21..374c03e10b2e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn; > * via a driver, and never indicated in the firmware-provided memory map as > * system RAM. This corresponds to IORESOURCE_SYSRAM_DRIVER_MANAGED in the > * kernel resource tree. > + * @MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE: capable of hardware encryption > */ > enum memblock_flags { > MEMBLOCK_NONE = 0x0, /* No special request */ > @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ enum memblock_flags { > MEMBLOCK_MIRROR = 0x2, /* mirrored region */ > MEMBLOCK_NOMAP = 0x4, /* don't add to kernel direct mapping */ > MEMBLOCK_DRIVER_MANAGED = 0x8, /* always detected via a driver */ > + MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE = 0x10, /* capable of hardware encryption */ Nit: please keep the comments aligned with TAB. > }; > > /** > @@ -121,6 +123,9 @@ int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align); > bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, > phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +bool memblock_node_is_crypto_capable(int nid); > +int memblock_mark_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +int memblock_clear_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_mark_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_clear_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 1018e50566f3..61ec50647469 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -191,6 +191,27 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, > return i < type->cnt; > } > > +/** > + * memblock_node_is_crypto_capable - get if whole node is capable > + * of encryption > + * @nid: number of node > + * > + * Iterate over all memory memblock_type and find if all regions under > + * node @nid are capable of hardware encryption. Please add Return: description, otherwise kernel-doc is unhappy > + */ > +bool __init_memblock memblock_node_is_crypto_capable(int nid) > +{ > + struct memblock_region *region; > + > + for_each_mem_region(region) { > + if ((memblock_get_region_node(region) == nid) && > + !(region->flags & MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE)) > + return false; > + } As we discussed on v3, please add a printk if the same node has both crypto-capable and not crypto-capable regions. https://lore.kernel.org/all/Ya++1FwWzKr2wYQH@kernel.org/ > + > + return true; > +} > + > /** > * __memblock_find_range_bottom_up - find free area utility in bottom-up > * @start: start of candidate range > @@ -885,6 +906,34 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base, > return 0; > } > > +/** > + * memblock_mark_crypto_capable - Mark memory regions capable of hardware > + * encryption with flag MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE. > + * @base: the base phys addr of the region > + * @size: the size of the region > + * > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > + */ > +int __init_memblock memblock_mark_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, > + phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE); > +} > + > +/** > + * memblock_clear_crypto_capable - Clear flag MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO for a > + * specified region. > + * @base: the base phys addr of the region > + * @size: the size of the region > + * > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure. > + */ > +int __init_memblock memblock_clear_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, > + phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE); > +} > + > /** > * memblock_mark_hotplug - Mark hotpluggable memory with flag MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG. > * @base: the base phys addr of the region > -- > 2.30.2 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.