linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, longpeng2@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, surenb@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for shared PTEs across processes
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:12:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfFWwjzSLsZ0aV6W@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfFO6VyMTrW1bWuu@casper.infradead.org>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 01:38:49PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:16:42AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > A while ago I talked with Peter about an extended uffd (here: WP)
> > mechanism that would work on fds instead of the process address space.
> 
> As far as I can tell, uffd is a grotesque hack that exists to work around
> the poor choice to use anonymous memory instead of file-backed memory
> in kvm.  Every time I see somebody mention it, I feel pain.

How file-backed memory would have helped for the major use-case of uffd
which is post-copy migration?

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-26 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-18 21:19 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for shared PTEs across processes Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm: Add new system calls mshare, mshare_unlink Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm: Add msharefs filesystem Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm: Add read for msharefs Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm: implement mshare_unlink syscall Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm: Add locking to msharefs syscalls Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:19 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm: Add basic page table sharing using mshare Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 21:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for shared PTEs across processes Dave Hansen
2022-01-18 21:46   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-18 22:47     ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-18 22:06 ` Dave Hansen
2022-01-18 22:52   ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-19 11:38 ` Mark Hemment
2022-01-19 17:02   ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-20 12:49     ` Mark Hemment
2022-01-20 19:15       ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-24 15:15         ` Mark Hemment
2022-01-24 15:27           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-24 22:20           ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-21  1:08 ` Barry Song
2022-01-21  2:13   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-21  7:35     ` Barry Song
2022-01-21 14:47       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-21 16:41         ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-22  1:39           ` Longpeng (Mike, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.)
2022-01-22  1:41             ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-22 10:18               ` Thomas Schoebel-Theuer
2022-01-22 16:09                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-22 11:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-22 18:29   ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-24 18:48   ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-24 19:45     ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-24 22:30       ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-24 23:16         ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-01-24 23:44           ` Khalid Aziz
2022-01-25 11:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-01-25 12:09   ` William Kucharski
2022-01-25 13:18     ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-25 14:01       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-01-25 13:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-25 13:59     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-01-25 14:09       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-25 18:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-01-25 18:59           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-26  4:04             ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-26 10:16               ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 13:38                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-26 13:55                   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 14:12                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-26 14:30                       ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-26 14:12                   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2022-01-26 13:42               ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-01-26 14:18                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-26 17:33                   ` Khalid Aziz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfFWwjzSLsZ0aV6W@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).