From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9CDC433F5 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B731C6B0071; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:28:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AFBB46B0072; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:28:51 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9C3B96B0073; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:28:51 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0086.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.86]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C7E6B0071 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:28:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C0E181C49B4 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:28:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79076147262.08.E8539BD Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A021180007 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:28:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=v4R+MNxGDgvnMIoJyFCcOJOTz5XsOTVIOqF2Bb/omEc=; b=hgsE8gRvbfG2JlRme+qpvJKT/B SQuQT31cYgQK9w+KwtDvjpsX+XMQEW3qI3ziLuifc6HvKMwRx3c9mF17jeEv+7Gghi9ZgzhsNRPoE YtQ6/JrFn6P5y5OvdW8H2eQpRJI3QlPpPyBgnFW6O17SO81xJLWst9DAV+HhV9KvAA35xuySD6OM2 3KCUpppL9QsKXKfjauclAOiTir5JxRPvw7O9JCmKsQ46wDNRO78wz54meFyxGDp9QGcI5eyDuuNlT M4TZcSlmCq4z65LgUUJ0DahtMA9oWi8GWmx1E6D9N5QwKhSM977+Ua1td0BeleC2W7P7XZTn6IT9k JYeca9eg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nD4pT-005GiJ-1P; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:28:47 +0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:28:47 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Karolina Drobnik Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.rapoport@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] tools: Move gfp.h and slab.h from radix-tree to lib Message-ID: References: <777d0cfcf531357cfe39d53987aa964a3a42ce8b.1643206612.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <777d0cfcf531357cfe39d53987aa964a3a42ce8b.1643206612.git.karolinadrobnik@gmail.com> X-Rspam-User: nil X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9A021180007 X-Stat-Signature: g3mmygeiqqnxtg76bbyciw56xnwif5rx Authentication-Results: imf06.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=hgsE8gRv; spf=none (imf06.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-HE-Tag: 1643290130-990068 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000480, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Karolina Drobnik wrote: > +#include > + > +#define __GFP_ZERO 0x8000u > +#define __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM 0x400000u > + > +#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 26 > +#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1)) > + > +#define __GFP_HIGH 0x20u > +#define __GFP_IO 0x40u > +#define __GFP_FS 0x80u > +#define __GFP_NOWARN 0x200u > +#define __GFP_ATOMIC 0x80000u > +#define __GFP_ACCOUNT 0x100000u > +#define __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM 0x2000000u Why have you reordered the bits here? > -#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 26 > -#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1)) > - > -#define __GFP_HIGH 0x20u > -#define __GFP_IO 0x40u > -#define __GFP_FS 0x80u > -#define __GFP_NOWARN 0x200u > -#define __GFP_ZERO 0x8000u > -#define __GFP_ATOMIC 0x80000u > -#define __GFP_ACCOUNT 0x100000u > -#define __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM 0x400000u > -#define __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM 0x2000000u The original ordering makes more sense to me (but then it would; I did it)