linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: fix is_pinnable_page against on cma page
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:08:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnxCCPZUfgQNXSg6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7bcda22-8ffe-67be-36bc-fcde58d8884a@nvidia.com>

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:49:06PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 5/11/22 15:37, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Yes. But one thing that is still unanswered, that I think you can
> > > answer, is: even if the compiler *did* re-read the mt variable, what
> > > problems could that cause? I claim "no problems", because there is
> > > no combination of 0, _CMA, _ISOLATE, _CMA|ISOLATE that will cause
> > > problems here.
> > 
> > What scenario I am concerning with __READ_ONCE so compiler
> > inlining get_pageblock_migratetype two times are
> > 
> >          CPU 0                                                       CPU 1
> >                                                                  alloc_contig_range
> > is_pinnable_page                                                start_isolate_page_range
> >                                                                    set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
> >     if (get_pageeblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_CMA)
> >         so it's false
> >                                                                  undo:
> >                                                                    set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_CMA)
> >     if (get_pageeblock_migratetype(page) == MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
> >         so it's false
> > 
> > In the end, CMA memory would be pinned by CPU 0 process
> > so CMA allocation keep failed until the process release the
> > refcount.
> > 
> 
> OK, so the code checks the wrong item each time. But the code really
> only needs to know "is either _CMA or _ISOLATE set?". And so you

Yes.

> can just sidestep the entire question by writing it like this:
> 
> int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> 
> if (mt & (MIGRATE_ISOLATE | MIGRATE_CMA))
> 	return false;

I am confused. Isn't it same question?

                                                    set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
if (get_pageblock_migrate(page) & MIGRATE_CMA)

                                                    set_pageblock_migratetype(MIGRATE_CMA)

if (get_pageblock_migrate(page) & MIGRATE_ISOLATE)


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-10 21:17 [PATCH v4] mm: fix is_pinnable_page against on cma page Minchan Kim
2022-05-10 22:56 ` John Hubbard
2022-05-10 23:31   ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-10 23:58     ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11  0:09       ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-11  4:32         ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11 21:46           ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-11 22:25             ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11 22:37               ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-11 22:49                 ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11 23:08                   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2022-05-11 23:13                     ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11 23:15                       ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-11 23:28                         ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-11 23:33                           ` John Hubbard
2022-05-11 23:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-11 23:57                         ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  0:12                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  0:12                           ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  0:22                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  0:26                               ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-12  0:34                                 ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  0:49                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  1:02                                     ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  1:03                                     ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-12  1:08                                       ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  2:18                                         ` John Hubbard
2022-05-12  3:44                                           ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-12  4:47                                             ` John Hubbard
2022-05-17 14:00                                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-17 18:12                                               ` John Hubbard
2022-05-17 19:28                                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-17 20:12                                                   ` John Hubbard
2022-05-17 20:21                                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-23 16:33                                                     ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-24  2:55                                                       ` John Hubbard
2022-05-24  5:16                                                         ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-24  6:22                                                           ` John Hubbard
2022-05-24 14:19                                                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-24 15:43                                                             ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-24 15:48                                                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-24 16:37                                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-24 16:59                                                                   ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-12  3:57                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-12  1:03                                   ` Minchan Kim
2022-05-12  0:35                                 ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnxCCPZUfgQNXSg6@google.com \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joaodias@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).