From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BA8C43334 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 11:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 66AA78D0002; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 07:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5EE818D0001; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 07:49:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 491A18D0002; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 07:49:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393EB8D0001 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 07:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1456820472 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 11:49:40 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79544012520.31.ECFBE96 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf27.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11F840038 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2022 11:49:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=TB+PasMPRGdy/jkWfabveRh+X4DQoZ0zEIC6kSjF58g=; b=OJtAnyg+Odw+HNIHNj67AOJ1xn OzdX3ktbywu3oQkhHUD2RytR1P4VAHNl4+kApnlNDsMrp3zz/qehUaPkobV0JZ1R7ENBBslHzUQYY wEvtfOCOG1LWOBGHLSVU5Jge9LvO/KphulBjwGqu+80JfAXVu+cg336h8Syd1x9QxvVxfxi+IJSiw xhVfzuZX+4Ivbp3ahcKTMuD4b4rEheQ11zLd68dB0EN7K5wWsygWP0e6OU/8Re6Lqilt6fkYC62zK +ED8Xwbiw5U6ou+0Udwq5O7VLOFWlPsDyETyXZJLenVSYUrFBcBK6qtf/YuhMKRXt7WVQ5ygw4M+3 rdqsYCTQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nxol6-009eWr-OZ; Sun, 05 Jun 2022 11:49:28 +0000 Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 12:49:28 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Chen Wandun Cc: hughd@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/shmem: check return value of shmem_init_inodecache Message-ID: References: <20220605035557.3957759-1-chenwandun@huawei.com> <20220605035557.3957759-2-chenwandun@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220605035557.3957759-2-chenwandun@huawei.com> Authentication-Results: imf27.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=OJtAnyg+; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf27.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org X-Stat-Signature: h1oqauxwufrs6kc8zx937h8buofcntqp X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E11F840038 X-HE-Tag: 1654429774-311801 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 11:55:55AM +0800, Chen Wandun wrote: > It will result in null pointer access if shmem_init_inodecache fail, > so check return value of shmem_init_inodecache You ignored my suggestion from v1. Here, let me write it out for you. +static int shmem_init_inodecache(void) { shmem_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create("shmem_inode_cache", sizeof(struct shmem_inode_info), 0, SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT, shmem_init_inode); + if (!shmem_inode_cachep) + return -ENOMEM; + return 0; } ... + error = shmem_init_inodecache(); + if (error) + goto out2;