From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, longman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 13:32:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yq+H0v0/nuxPRLX+@castle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530074919.46352-10-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:49:17PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> We will reuse the obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages. Finally,
> page->memcg_data will have 2 different meanings.
>
> - For the slab pages, page->memcg_data points to an object cgroups
> vector.
>
> - For the kmem pages (exclude the slab pages) and the LRU pages,
> page->memcg_data points to an object cgroup.
>
> In this patch, we reuse obj_cgroup APIs to charge LRU pages. In the end,
> The page cache cannot prevent long-living objects from pinning the original
> memory cgroup in the memory.
>
> At the same time we also changed the rules of page and objcg or memcg
> binding stability. The new rules are as follows.
>
> For a page any of the following ensures page and objcg binding stability:
>
> - the page lock
> - LRU isolation
> - lock_page_memcg()
> - exclusive reference
>
> Based on the stable binding of page and objcg, for a page any of the
> following ensures page and memcg binding stability:
>
> - objcg_lock
> - cgroup_mutex
> - the lruvec lock
> - the split queue lock (only THP page)
>
> If the caller only want to ensure that the page counters of memcg are
> updated correctly, ensure that the binding stability of page and objcg
> is sufficient.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Aside from two questions, which I raised in the comments to previous patches
in the series:
1) perf impact,
2) should we open-code the reparenting procedure to show the locking in a more
explicit ways?
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-19 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 7:49 [PATCH v5 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code and comments Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} to lruvec_unlock{_irq, _irqrestore} Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-01 18:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-02 10:48 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-02 3:06 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 6:13 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 7:14 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-02 4:14 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-19 20:32 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
2022-05-30 21:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 2:26 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-31 2:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-31 2:41 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-31 7:29 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:43 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 3:09 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yq+H0v0/nuxPRLX+@castle \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).