From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, longman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:13:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqPQGrtp9v0Ly9SG@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220530074919.46352-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:49:11PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> Pagecache pages are charged at the allocation time and holding a
> reference to the original memory cgroup until being reclaimed.
> Depending on the memory pressure, specific patterns of the page
> sharing between different cgroups and the cgroup creation and
> destruction rates, a large number of dying memory cgroups can be
> pinned by pagecache pages. It makes the page reclaim less efficient
> and wastes memory.
>
> We can convert LRU pages and most other raw memcg pins to the objcg
> direction to fix this problem, and then the page->memcg will always
> point to an object cgroup pointer.
>
> Therefore, the infrastructure of objcg no longer only serves
> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM. In this patch, we move the infrastructure of the
> objcg out of the scope of the CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM so that the LRU pages
> can reuse it to charge pages.
>
> We know that the LRU pages are not accounted at the root level. But
> the page->memcg_data points to the root_mem_cgroup. So the
> page->memcg_data of the LRU pages always points to a valid pointer.
> But the root_mem_cgroup dose not have an object cgroup. If we use
> obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages, we should set the
> page->memcg_data to a root object cgroup. So we also allocate an
> object cgroup for the root_mem_cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
LGTM
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-10 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-30 7:49 [PATCH v5 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] mm: memcontrol: remove dead code and comments Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] mm: rename unlock_page_lruvec{_irq, _irqrestore} to lruvec_unlock{_irq, _irqrestore} Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-01 18:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-02 10:48 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-02 3:06 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-10 23:13 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] mm: memcontrol: make lruvec lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] mm: vmscan: rework move_pages_to_lru() Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] mm: memcontrol: make all the callers of {folio,page}_memcg() safe Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 6:13 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] mm: memcontrol: introduce memcg_reparent_ops Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-20 7:14 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] mm: memcontrol: use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Muchun Song
2022-06-01 17:34 ` Michal Koutný
2022-06-02 4:14 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-19 20:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] mm: lru: add VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO to lru maintenance function Muchun Song
2022-06-19 19:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-30 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] mm: lru: use lruvec lock to serialize memcg changes Muchun Song
2022-05-30 21:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] Use obj_cgroup APIs to charge the LRU pages Andrew Morton
2022-05-31 2:26 ` Muchun Song
2022-05-31 2:46 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-31 2:41 ` Waiman Long
2022-05-31 7:29 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:43 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-09 2:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-06-09 3:09 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqPQGrtp9v0Ly9SG@carbon \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).