From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/kmemleak: Prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:11:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yqn2jxZhk5Neomu7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614220359.59282-4-longman@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 06:03:59PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 7dd64139a7c7..abba063ae5ee 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -1417,12 +1417,16 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
> struct zone *zone;
> int __maybe_unused i;
> int new_leaks = 0;
> + int loop1_cnt = 0;
>
> jiffies_last_scan = jiffies;
>
> /* prepare the kmemleak_object's */
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) {
> + bool obj_pinned = false;
> +
> + loop1_cnt++;
> raw_spin_lock_irq(&object->lock);
> #ifdef DEBUG
> /*
> @@ -1437,10 +1441,32 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
> #endif
> /* reset the reference count (whiten the object) */
> object->count = 0;
> - if (color_gray(object) && get_object(object))
> + if (color_gray(object) && get_object(object)) {
> list_add_tail(&object->gray_list, &gray_list);
> + obj_pinned = true;
> + }
>
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&object->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Do a cond_resched() to avoid soft lockup every 64k objects.
> + * Make sure a reference has been taken so that the object
> + * won't go away without RCU read lock.
> + */
> + if (!(loop1_cnt & 0xffff)) {
> + if (!obj_pinned && !get_object(object)) {
> + /* Try the next object instead */
> + loop1_cnt--;
> + continue;
> + }
With this trick we could probably get rid of rcu_read_lock() and take
the kmemleak_lock instead. But that's for another patch.
> +
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + cond_resched();
> + rcu_read_lock();
cond_resched_rcu() to save a couple of lines?
> +
> + if (!obj_pinned)
> + put_object(object);
> + }
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 22:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/kmemleak: Avoid soft lockup in kmemleak_scan() Waiman Long
2022-06-14 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/kmemleak: Use _irq lock/unlock variants in kmemleak_scan/_clear() Waiman Long
2022-06-14 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/kmemleak: Skip unlikely objects in kmemleak_scan() without taking lock Waiman Long
2022-06-14 22:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/kmemleak: Prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan() Waiman Long
2022-06-15 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-06-15 16:07 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yqn2jxZhk5Neomu7@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).