From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"guanghui.fgh" <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@redhat.com, jianyong.wu@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
quic_qiancai@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
jonathan@marek.ca, mark.rutland@arm.com,
thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
linux-mm@kvack.org, yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com,
alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: fix linear mem mapping access performance degradation
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 18:57:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsRfgX7FFZLxQU50@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsRZ8V8mQ+HM31D6@arm.com>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 04:34:09PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 06:02:02PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > +void __init remap_crashkernel(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> > + phys_addr_t start, end, size;
> > + phys_addr_t aligned_start, aligned_end;
> > +
> > + if (can_set_direct_map() || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KFENCE))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!crashk_res.end)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + start = crashk_res.start & PAGE_MASK;
> > + end = PAGE_ALIGN(crashk_res.end);
> > +
> > + aligned_start = ALIGN_DOWN(crashk_res.start, PUD_SIZE);
> > + aligned_end = ALIGN(end, PUD_SIZE);
> > +
> > + /* Clear PUDs containing crash kernel memory */
> > + unmap_hotplug_range(__phys_to_virt(aligned_start),
> > + __phys_to_virt(aligned_end), false, NULL);
>
> What I don't understand is what happens if there's valid kernel data
> between aligned_start and crashk_res.start (or the other end of the
> range).
Data shouldn't go anywhere :)
There is
+ /* map area from PUD start to start of crash kernel with large pages */
+ size = start - aligned_start;
+ __create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, aligned_start,
+ __phys_to_virt(aligned_start),
+ size, PAGE_KERNEL, early_pgtable_alloc, 0);
and
+ /* map area from end of crash kernel to PUD end with large pages */
+ size = aligned_end - end;
+ __create_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, end, __phys_to_virt(end),
+ size, PAGE_KERNEL, early_pgtable_alloc, 0);
after the unmap, so after we tear down a part of a linear map we
immediately recreate it, just with a different page size.
This all happens before SMP, so there is no concurrency at that point.
> --
> Catalin
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-02 15:57 [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: fix linear mem mapping access performance degradation Guanghui Feng
2022-07-04 10:35 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 10:58 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 12:05 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 13:15 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 13:41 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:11 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 14:23 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 14:34 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-04 16:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-04 17:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-07-05 8:35 ` Baoquan He
2022-07-05 9:52 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:07 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:11 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-05 12:27 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 12:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 13:17 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-05 15:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 15:57 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2022-07-05 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-05 20:45 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06 2:49 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 7:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 10:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-06 13:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-06 15:18 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:30 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-06 15:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-07-07 17:02 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-08 12:28 ` [PATCH RESEND " guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 13:44 ` [PATCH v5] " Guanghui Feng
2022-07-10 14:32 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-10 15:33 ` guanghui.fgh
2022-07-18 13:10 ` Will Deacon
2022-07-25 6:46 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-05 2:44 ` [PATCH v4] " guanghui.fgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YsRfgX7FFZLxQU50@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alikernel-developer@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yaohongbo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).