linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"bwidawsk@kernel.org" <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: fix policy_nodemask() for MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY case
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 04:43:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yurd2iYp4XMIYM7T@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yupb+1mmn9sQ/G8K@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 07:28:59PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 04-08-22 01:14:32, Feng Tang wrote:
> [...]
> > Ok, I change it as below:
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to make this allowed_mems_nr specific to be
> explicit about the intention?
 
Yes, it is.

> Not that I feel strongly about that.
> 
> > ---
> >  mm/hugetlb.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Not even compile tested
>  include/linux/mempolicy.h | 12 ------------
>  mm/hugetlb.c              | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> index 668389b4b53d..e38b0ef20b8b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> @@ -151,13 +151,6 @@ extern bool mempolicy_in_oom_domain(struct task_struct *tsk,
>  				const nodemask_t *mask);
>  extern nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy);
>  
> -static inline nodemask_t *policy_nodemask_current(gfp_t gfp)
> -{
> -	struct mempolicy *mpol = get_task_policy(current);
> -
> -	return policy_nodemask(gfp, mpol);
> -}
> -
>  extern unsigned int mempolicy_slab_node(void);
>  
>  extern enum zone_type policy_zone;
> @@ -294,11 +287,6 @@ static inline void mpol_put_task_policy(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -static inline nodemask_t *policy_nodemask_current(gfp_t gfp)
> -{
> -	return NULL;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool mpol_is_preferred_many(struct mempolicy *pol)
>  {
>  	return  false;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index a18c071c294e..6cacbc9b15a1 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4330,18 +4330,34 @@ static int __init default_hugepagesz_setup(char *s)
>  }
>  __setup("default_hugepagesz=", default_hugepagesz_setup);
>  
> +struct mempolicy *policy_mbind_nodemask(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMPOLICY
> +	struct mempolicy *mpol = get_task_policy(current);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * only enforce MBIND which overlaps with cpuset policy (from policy_nodemask)
> +	 * specifically for hugetlb case
> +	 */
> +	if (mpol->mode == MPOL_BIND &&
> +		(apply_policy_zone(mpol, gfp_zone(gfp)) &&
> +		 cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->nodes))
> +		return &mpol->nodes;
> +#endif
> +	return NULL;

I saw the logic is not changed, and it confused me that if there is
no qualified node, it will still return NULL which effectively equals
node_states[N_MEMORY], while I think it should return a all zero
nodemasks.

Thanks,
Feng

> +}
> +
>  static unsigned int allowed_mems_nr(struct hstate *h)
>  {
>  	int node;
>  	unsigned int nr = 0;
> -	nodemask_t *mpol_allowed;
> +	nodemask_t *mbind_nodemask;
>  	unsigned int *array = h->free_huge_pages_node;
>  	gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
>  
> -	mpol_allowed = policy_nodemask_current(gfp_mask);
> -
> +	mbind_nodemask = policy_mbind_nodemask(gfp_mask);
>  	for_each_node_mask(node, cpuset_current_mems_allowed) {
> -		if (!mpol_allowed || node_isset(node, *mpol_allowed))
> +		if (!mbind_nodemask || node_isset(node, *mbind_nodemask))
>  			nr += array[node];
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-03 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-01  8:42 [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: fix policy_nodemask() for MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY case Muchun Song
2022-08-01  9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-01  9:26   ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02  3:42     ` Muchun Song
2022-08-02  5:52       ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02  6:40         ` Muchun Song
2022-08-02  7:39           ` Feng Tang
2022-08-02  9:02             ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-03  6:41               ` Feng Tang
2022-08-03  7:36                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-03 17:14                   ` Feng Tang
2022-08-03 11:28                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-03 20:43                       ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-08-03 12:56                         ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-03 21:08                           ` Feng Tang
2022-08-03 13:21                             ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-04  8:27                               ` Feng Tang
2022-08-04 10:43                                 ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-04 13:03                                   ` [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: add dedicated func to get 'allowed' nodemask for current process Feng Tang
2022-08-04 13:36                                     ` Michal Hocko
2022-08-04 22:37                                       ` Andrew Morton
2022-08-05  0:06                                         ` Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yurd2iYp4XMIYM7T@feng-clx \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).