linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: slub: fix flush_cpu_slab()/__free_slab() invocations in task context.
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:59:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yw5eFGRreMA0I95S@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFL455=4SBhJ4LpiPQr+PmL2ShuTpR=bAo8JVfe-2x3cg85cbQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022-08-30 17:48:06 [+0200], Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
> Hmm, this is not good indeed. I guess I should have used for_each_online_cpu()
> instead of on_each_cpu_cond().

But you must not invoked that function cross-CPU since the code expects
to access the per-CPU variables always from the local-CPU.

> >
> > Couldn't we instead use a workqueue with that WQ_MEM_RECLAIM bit? It may
> > reclaim memory after all ;)
> 
> That should also fix it, do you think it would be ok to allocate a workqueue in
> in kmem_cache_init() ?

I guess so. There is probably none that is already available.

> Thanks,
> Maurizio

Sebastian


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29 15:48 [PATCH RFC] mm: slub: fix flush_cpu_slab()/__free_slab() invocations in task context Maurizio Lombardi
2022-08-30 10:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-08-30 15:48   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2022-08-30 18:59     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-08-30 19:03       ` Maurizio Lombardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yw5eFGRreMA0I95S@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).