linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"John Garry" <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:06:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxWgEZTxyI/4ISHa@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ff805f4-76ae-fc0f-424f-4d230c08285e@suse.cz>

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 02:29:51PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/5/22 04:55, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 06:58:49PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:42:33PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:03:34PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > This patch is okay but with patch 4, init_object() initializes redzone/poison area
> >> > > > > using s->object_size, and init_kmalloc_object() fixes redzone/poison area using orig_size.
> >> > > > > Why not do it in init_object() in the first time?
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Also, updating redzone/poison area after alloc_single_from_new_slab()
> >> > > > > (outside list_lock, after adding slab to list) will introduce races with validation.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > So I think doing set_orig_size()/init_kmalloc_object() in alloc_debug_processing() would make more sense.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Yes, this makes sense, and in v3, kmalloc redzone/poison setup was
> >> > > > done in alloc_debug_processing() (through init_object()). When
> >> > > > rebasing to v4, I met the classical problem: how to pass 'orig_size'
> >> > > > parameter :)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > In latest 'for-next' branch, one call path for alloc_debug_processing()
> >> > > > is
> >> > > >   ___slab_alloc
> >> > > >     get_partial
> >> > > >       get_any_partial
> >> > > >         get_partial_node
> >> > > >           alloc_debug_processing
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Adding 'orig_size' paramter to all these function looks horrible, and
> >> > > > I couldn't figure out a good way and chosed to put those ops after
> >> > > > 'set_track()'
> >> > > 
> >> > > IMO adding a parameter to them isn't too horrible...
> >> > > I don't see better solution than adding a parameter with current implementation.
> >> > > (Yeah, the code is quite complicated...)
> >> > > 
> >> > > It won't affect performance to meaningful degree as most of
> >> > > allocations will be served from cpu slab or percpu partial list. 
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks for the suggestion! I'm fine with it and just afraid other
> >> > developers may dislike the extra parameter. 
> >> > 
> >> > The race condition you mentioned is a valid concern, and I have thought
> >> > about it, one way is moving the set_orig_size() after the redzone/poision
> >> > setup, and in 'check_object()' we can detect whether the 'orig_size' is
> >> > set, and skip that check if it's not set yet. As the manual validate_slab
> >> > triggered from sysfs interface is a rare debug activity, I think skipping
> >> > one object shouldn't hurt much.
> >> 
> >> That will require smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() pair to make sure that
> >> effects of set_orig_size() to be visible after redzone/poison setup.
> > 
> > Yes, synchronization is needed here.
> > 
> >> Isn't it simpler to add a parameter?
> > 
> > OK, I can go this way in v5 if other developers are fine. thanks
> 
> How about get_partial() instantiates an on-stack structure that contains
> gfpflags, ret_slab, orig_size and passes pointer to that to all the nested
> functions.
> 
> Would be similar to "struct alloc_context" in page allocation.
> Something like "struct partial_context pc"?

Yep! This would make the parameters passing much tidier. Will try
this way. 

More aggressively is to also embed the 'kmem_cache' parameter into
it, but this may make the code look ambiguous.

Thanks,
Feng




  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-05  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29  7:56 [PATCH v4 0/4] mm/slub: some debug enhancements for kmalloc objects Feng Tang
2022-08-29  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-08-31 14:52   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-01  5:04     ` Feng Tang
2022-09-01 11:14       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-01 14:01   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-02  6:15     ` Feng Tang
2022-09-04  9:03       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-04  9:42         ` Feng Tang
2022-09-04 10:58           ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-05  2:55             ` Feng Tang
2022-09-05  6:29               ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-05  7:06                 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-09-05  7:33                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-05  8:37                     ` Feng Tang
2022-09-06 13:39                       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-29  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-08-29  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache Feng Tang
2022-08-29  7:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to cover extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxWgEZTxyI/4ISHa@feng-clx \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).