From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"John Garry" <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 15:06:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxWgEZTxyI/4ISHa@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ff805f4-76ae-fc0f-424f-4d230c08285e@suse.cz>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 02:29:51PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/5/22 04:55, Feng Tang wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 06:58:49PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:42:33PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:03:34PM +0800, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > This patch is okay but with patch 4, init_object() initializes redzone/poison area
> >> > > > > using s->object_size, and init_kmalloc_object() fixes redzone/poison area using orig_size.
> >> > > > > Why not do it in init_object() in the first time?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Also, updating redzone/poison area after alloc_single_from_new_slab()
> >> > > > > (outside list_lock, after adding slab to list) will introduce races with validation.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > So I think doing set_orig_size()/init_kmalloc_object() in alloc_debug_processing() would make more sense.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Yes, this makes sense, and in v3, kmalloc redzone/poison setup was
> >> > > > done in alloc_debug_processing() (through init_object()). When
> >> > > > rebasing to v4, I met the classical problem: how to pass 'orig_size'
> >> > > > parameter :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In latest 'for-next' branch, one call path for alloc_debug_processing()
> >> > > > is
> >> > > > ___slab_alloc
> >> > > > get_partial
> >> > > > get_any_partial
> >> > > > get_partial_node
> >> > > > alloc_debug_processing
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Adding 'orig_size' paramter to all these function looks horrible, and
> >> > > > I couldn't figure out a good way and chosed to put those ops after
> >> > > > 'set_track()'
> >> > >
> >> > > IMO adding a parameter to them isn't too horrible...
> >> > > I don't see better solution than adding a parameter with current implementation.
> >> > > (Yeah, the code is quite complicated...)
> >> > >
> >> > > It won't affect performance to meaningful degree as most of
> >> > > allocations will be served from cpu slab or percpu partial list.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the suggestion! I'm fine with it and just afraid other
> >> > developers may dislike the extra parameter.
> >> >
> >> > The race condition you mentioned is a valid concern, and I have thought
> >> > about it, one way is moving the set_orig_size() after the redzone/poision
> >> > setup, and in 'check_object()' we can detect whether the 'orig_size' is
> >> > set, and skip that check if it's not set yet. As the manual validate_slab
> >> > triggered from sysfs interface is a rare debug activity, I think skipping
> >> > one object shouldn't hurt much.
> >>
> >> That will require smp_wmb()/smp_rmb() pair to make sure that
> >> effects of set_orig_size() to be visible after redzone/poison setup.
> >
> > Yes, synchronization is needed here.
> >
> >> Isn't it simpler to add a parameter?
> >
> > OK, I can go this way in v5 if other developers are fine. thanks
>
> How about get_partial() instantiates an on-stack structure that contains
> gfpflags, ret_slab, orig_size and passes pointer to that to all the nested
> functions.
>
> Would be similar to "struct alloc_context" in page allocation.
> Something like "struct partial_context pc"?
Yep! This would make the parameters passing much tidier. Will try
this way.
More aggressively is to also embed the 'kmem_cache' parameter into
it, but this may make the code look ambiguous.
Thanks,
Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 7:56 [PATCH v4 0/4] mm/slub: some debug enhancements for kmalloc objects Feng Tang
2022-08-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-08-31 14:52 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-01 5:04 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-01 11:14 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-01 14:01 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-02 6:15 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-04 9:03 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-04 9:42 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-04 10:58 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-09-05 2:55 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-05 6:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-05 7:06 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-09-05 7:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-05 8:37 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-06 13:39 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-08-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-08-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache Feng Tang
2022-08-29 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to cover extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxWgEZTxyI/4ISHa@feng-clx \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).