From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 20:02:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yyr9ZZnVPgr4GHYQ@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZdFi471MxQG9RduQcBZWR10GCqxyNkuaDXzX6y4zCaYAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrey,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 03:20:58AM +0800, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:54 AM Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > When kasan is enabled for slab/slub, it may save kasan' free_meta
> > data in the former part of slab object data area in slab object's
> > free path, which works fine.
> >
> > There is ongoing effort to extend slub's debug function which will
> > redzone the latter part of kmalloc object area, and when both of
> > the debug are enabled, there is possible conflict, especially when
> > the kmalloc object has small size, as caught by 0Day bot [1]
> >
> > For better information for slab/slub, add free_meta's data size
> > into 'struct kasan_cache', so that its users can take right action
> > to avoid data conflict.
> >
> > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YuYm3dWwpZwH58Hu@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kasan.h | 2 ++
> > mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
> > index b092277bf48d..49af9513e8ed 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kasan.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
> > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static inline bool kasan_has_integrated_init(void)
> > struct kasan_cache {
> > int alloc_meta_offset;
> > int free_meta_offset;
> > + /* size of free_meta data saved in object's data area */
> > + int free_meta_size;
> > bool is_kmalloc;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> > index 69f583855c8b..0cb867e92524 100644
> > --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> > @@ -201,6 +201,8 @@ void __kasan_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *cache, unsigned int *size,
> > cache->kasan_info.free_meta_offset = KASAN_NO_FREE_META;
> > *size = ok_size;
> > }
> > + } else {
> > + cache->kasan_info.free_meta_size = sizeof(struct kasan_free_meta);
>
> Hi Feng,
>
> I just realized that we already have a function that exposes a similar
> functionality: kasan_metadata_size. However, this function returns the
> size of metadata that is stored in the redzone.
>
> I think, instead of adding free_meta_size, a better approach would be to:
>
> 1. Rename kasan_metadata_size to kasan_metadata_size_in_redzone (or
> something like that).
> 2. Add kasan_metadata_size_in_object with appropriate implementation
> and use that in your patches.
>
> This allows avoiding exposing KASAN-internal details such as what kind
> of fields the kasan_cache struct has to the common code.
Agree, it's better not touch the internal fields in slub code.
How about the following patch, it merge the 2 functions with one flag
indicating in meta data or object. (I'm fine with 2 separate functions)
diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
index b092277bf48d..0ad05a34e708 100644
--- a/include/linux/kasan.h
+++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
@@ -150,11 +150,12 @@ static __always_inline void kasan_cache_create_kmalloc(struct kmem_cache *cache)
__kasan_cache_create_kmalloc(cache);
}
-size_t __kasan_metadata_size(struct kmem_cache *cache);
-static __always_inline size_t kasan_metadata_size(struct kmem_cache *cache)
+size_t __kasan_meta_size(struct kmem_cache *cache, bool in_slab_object);
+static __always_inline size_t kasan_meta_size(struct kmem_cache *cache,
+ bool in_slab_object)
{
if (kasan_enabled())
- return __kasan_metadata_size(cache);
+ return __kasan_meta_size(cache, in_slab_object);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 69f583855c8b..2a8710461ebb 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -218,14 +218,21 @@ void __kasan_cache_create_kmalloc(struct kmem_cache *cache)
cache->kasan_info.is_kmalloc = true;
}
-size_t __kasan_metadata_size(struct kmem_cache *cache)
+size_t __kasan_meta_size(struct kmem_cache *cache, bool in_slab_object)
{
if (!kasan_stack_collection_enabled())
return 0;
- return (cache->kasan_info.alloc_meta_offset ?
- sizeof(struct kasan_alloc_meta) : 0) +
- (cache->kasan_info.free_meta_offset ?
- sizeof(struct kasan_free_meta) : 0);
+
+ if (in_slab_object)
+ return (cache->kasan_info.alloc_meta_offset == 0 ?
+ sizeof(struct kasan_alloc_meta) : 0) +
+ (cache->kasan_info.free_meta_offset ?
+ sizeof(struct kasan_free_meta) : 0);
+ else
+ return (cache->kasan_info.alloc_meta_offset == 0 ?
+ sizeof(struct kasan_alloc_meta) : 0) +
+ (cache->kasan_info.free_meta_offset ?
+ sizeof(struct kasan_free_meta) : 0);
}
struct kasan_alloc_meta *kasan_get_alloc_meta(struct kmem_cache *cache,
> Sorry for nor realizing this straight away.
>
> (Note that there's an upcoming patch that fixes a bug in
> kasan_metadata_size' implementation [1].)
Thanks for the note, will check this when making the formal patch.
- Feng
> Thanks!
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/c7b316d30d90e5947eb8280f4dc78856a49298cf.1662411799.git.andreyknvl@google.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 6:54 [PATCH v6 0/4] mm/slub: some debug enhancements for kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-23 11:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-24 7:08 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-30 19:23 ` John Thomson
2022-10-30 21:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-31 2:36 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 10:05 ` John Thomson
2022-10-31 11:36 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-31 11:42 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 0:18 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 2:41 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 7:57 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 9:20 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 9:31 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 10:33 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 10:42 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 13:55 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 19:39 ` John Thomson
2022-11-02 6:08 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02 7:16 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03 7:18 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 7:45 ` John Thomson
2022-11-03 8:16 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 5:54 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 8:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 14:16 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 14:36 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 17:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-04 3:52 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-26 19:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-26 20:15 ` Kees Cook
2022-09-27 1:22 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-27 2:42 ` Feng Tang
2022-10-13 14:00 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-10-14 5:59 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache Feng Tang
2022-09-20 19:20 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-21 12:02 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-09-24 18:05 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-25 11:26 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-25 16:31 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-27 3:03 ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13 6:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
2022-09-13 8:53 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yyr9ZZnVPgr4GHYQ@feng-clx \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).