From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] list_lru: expand list_lru_add() docs with info about sublists
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:05:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0j3Nfm_EXiGPObq@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128-list_lru_memcg_docs-v1-1-7e4568978f4e@google.com>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:12:11PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> - * Return: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
> + * Return value: true if the item was added, false otherwise
This is an incorrect change. The section is always called 'Return', not
'Return value'; see Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst. And I
think it was fine to say "list was updated" rather than "item was
added". They're basically synonyms.
> - * Return value: true if the list was updated, false otherwise
> + * Return value: true if the item was added, false otherwise
Ditto (and other similar changes)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 12:12 [PATCH] list_lru: expand list_lru_add() docs with info about sublists Alice Ryhl
2024-11-28 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2024-11-28 23:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-11-29 8:58 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-29 14:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-11-29 14:59 ` Alice Ryhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0j3Nfm_EXiGPObq@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox