From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>,
tj@kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] cgroup: add level of indirection for cgroup_rstat struct
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 17:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7dhjBB8NJmxWg0F@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xl2xxrfpixx66hbywv3njmdj6cckawtjiwri5nxcbc2gtz2ahu@5axlmmuzplzz>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 06:26:07PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:14:39PM -0800, JP Kobryn wrote:
> > Change the type of rstat node from cgroup to the new cgroup_rstat
> > struct. Then for the rstat updated/flush api calls, add double under
> > versions that accept references to the cgroup_rstat struct. This new
> > level of indirection will allow for extending the public api further.
> > i.e. the cgroup_rstat struct can be embedded in a new type of object and
> > a public api can be added for that new type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
>
> I think the code looks good here but the commit message needs some
> massaging. From what I understand, you are trying to decouple struct
> cgroup_rstat from struct cgroup, so later you can move struct
> cgroup_rstat in different structure (and maybe later some new structure
> can all include cgroup_rstat to take advantage of rstat infra). I am not
> sure I would call this "add level of indirection".
+1 here and probably in other patches too. "Add level of indirection"
sounds like we are dereferencing one more pointer, which is not the case
here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 3:14 [PATCH 00/11] cgroup: separate rstat trees JP Kobryn
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 01/11] cgroup: move rstat pointers into struct of their own JP Kobryn
2025-02-19 1:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-19 1:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-20 16:53 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-24 17:06 ` JP Kobryn
2025-02-24 18:36 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 02/11] cgroup: add level of indirection for cgroup_rstat struct JP Kobryn
2025-02-19 2:26 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-20 17:08 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-02-19 5:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 03/11] cgroup: move cgroup_rstat from cgroup to cgroup_subsys_state JP Kobryn
2025-02-20 17:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-20 17:22 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-25 19:20 ` JP Kobryn
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 04/11] cgroup: introduce cgroup_rstat_ops JP Kobryn
2025-02-19 7:21 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-20 17:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 05/11] cgroup: separate rstat for bpf cgroups JP Kobryn
2025-02-21 18:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: rstat lock indirection JP Kobryn
2025-02-21 22:09 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 07/11] cgroup: fetch cpu-specific lock in rstat cpu lock helpers JP Kobryn
2025-02-21 22:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 08/11] cgroup: rstat cpu lock indirection JP Kobryn
2025-02-19 8:48 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-22 0:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 09/11] cgroup: separate rstat locks for bpf cgroups JP Kobryn
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 10/11] cgroup: separate rstat locks for subsystems JP Kobryn
2025-02-22 0:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-18 3:14 ` [PATCH 11/11] cgroup: separate rstat list pointers from base stats JP Kobryn
2025-02-22 0:28 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-20 15:51 ` [PATCH 00/11] cgroup: separate rstat trees Tejun Heo
2025-02-27 23:44 ` JP Kobryn
2025-02-20 17:26 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-20 17:53 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-20 17:59 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-20 18:14 ` JP Kobryn
2025-02-20 20:04 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-20 20:22 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-02-24 21:13 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-24 21:54 ` Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7dhjBB8NJmxWg0F@google.com \
--to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=inwardvessel@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).