From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B7AC001DF for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 634526B0071; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5E42C6B0074; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4ABA48E0001; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383546B0071 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:07:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6401C9A3C for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:07:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81046834386.23.F15B7E6 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E758240262 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=DqdjuzgX; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1690211169; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=CwS+gUuv2XOM9O2NP111HTOnlB9f6LWeUnrAZXT+Fo4=; b=knInjVnE813011VkTHvxNQ3/Xz53O7YOuCiz1IjC62g0p3KRUNGWpM9a1PRUx10V6BfpFt 0pO1bhszOHDrmSfu/j1TNdS0muiczW+pny8ndXDpXQChkbACzJq4Fp1xRKXBk+c1mSAVVp ir1JFNSbTe0VjyjgCFxUJwI422AqyuA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=DqdjuzgX; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1690211169; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Z7iKJ6+7ZSGxxwNsHglNrw08ZL11X6Se/gNx7PC9Mfs8xpruKYM53RnCMXKZS1jyvtfPwr 8fJw9kmFRUEacJLO7CIDHW5qxBkkLAykoRbG2icm4ZxhO5n9DlwGWnb9rJtPKxAfoBE3q+ dQAa5s2rieFVl2f8juvSVWoLdlwbehs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=CwS+gUuv2XOM9O2NP111HTOnlB9f6LWeUnrAZXT+Fo4=; b=DqdjuzgXScazPigNtNUZlVnbyL uMvl+IyKGN0rU8xl2LdMl8dKeIgKmF2Y/jK3Ne5JFQ+Ouw+yIB1M0y9Htp0OloZRLt4iHABQQ4Q5s R1JeDZBcqOzSZJklEnAD7/Yw3Yg0hbe7qI/S2jUq3aaa5D37v8Cn4r/uqG+FmfjQ8sCfvomkSQmfI XKJCQvDdCDLhl66QTE+mTDwXaw0vfCMF9qkejWMgDh0spc4fLYToc+ElLDLqivK/Ukl0UKalmkO8P y0DheW7astIQWDW/3pDf7DgC7gCfJDN+aWFUGLBR0Oin9HYOwSVeXmNItgLIbvk2D/xvgLNKmk6CY Jor71GpQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qNx8K-004WKn-4z; Mon, 24 Jul 2023 15:06:00 +0000 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:06:00 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jann Horn Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan , linux-mm@kvack.org, Arjun Roy , Eric Dumazet , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Punit Agrawal , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] Revert "tcp: Use per-vma locking for receive zerocopy" Message-ID: References: <20230711202047.3818697-1-willy@infradead.org> <20230711202047.3818697-2-willy@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E758240262 X-Stat-Signature: s4hh3uww6cfrg5q7jkf7yjnsyitbnd1p X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1690211166-458515 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/3L9NqBAyyamW9Zr2hqlaTXgcCH2WVqOvZoMd8wTBp5hB4AauBvypfugDPELy67BLJXyBK3D1EYwiDPqk2IaQ8t+2rb/04hGHAsz0TMrbHiELTAywPly+iLlL1MKNO7MSpXsXB0cB03drBughT0Ir3IgrbWDSojAeNO+/uRmr+uGvhrPnDpuk8zwlh3dXGnUNnSMDOaMkPQNut5B06LPk3yLxbPgkx86Syl5V/WuY/lZOudJzKYH3T6mm4D2+Cx+qYEn8gqeN7LqV08AF3HINMI2UactEC+H0gQAN1pPgQRj2bQpGw8Qf/UwJHOjQ+vdYH2j00E5lKG33Lq8JXRBGtX3OwzuJ6C9iRm76j6N61M0KgH00/Jt1M4XygfqtLS6llVnsT/VZFfo5ljSDBzu5kPpy5w7qZ/2xMd6QTkDGGKtR6zJ047L7YZGb2MofPnioTTeICoaaQV0eLIG5fuoWKwfpmswpSynwSD3fF0bVhtkkq8/zfvoVMcBUIAS5ACq3An+tyEXrwTbm4y0tyI7RaZ88varSzsaCuFVAPKNHxQN2LKD69AlXNlpFJHG6HuiAxLj2hLGfMUj32CbRr9A4EcgIEuDVlYM+BVYoga01/nqLHEC141tnOLMTtrUbYGWvyMCNfQt+xyofF4NN3ZDpbpP3iBM7zWTbLhp/V+V+v2ZxPMHqkZ7Ma+Upy4tXJjvHpoZC2H5mNCIfYJ4SwmeUJgU5ZtprCq9RYB1Tp4TfbJb9sP0L/yjyA33DXA0hxSm7vaNiQMzfDv1avu4dX96NUjNP8pqhGRn4P/WXMKJiiwR/zuhSWsXlmHXJx47j3cy4xJYaGp48cgjSDqNFX5S2Kp/lHwaIHjsdt4b7zsAOs1aaQxeKqHACyWZYJSClF8ighuo27rGBD6TCG4n7FZnmOXkmgq7nQR1L1z6CRVLuchFzhV5E7GMAF4MGxv0iJYHbnJSM6G+/ D16hXWRP oYR8ElSE+BsJqNxFpJ8K9bzP4ooz8bM68Dxh7DUEGeOmgM4N/+KbSCMEdO9EVISVr7SalXRyD8v04nPpOH2SEbylG9k6CcmzA2XvJYxMIw1OtW/RIwnWrfKw4zJ7SJ99F94B+e0l6NCOv5QvkJ81vkDgEHFAtIQFozOsFL3a6O0dw3bVUbsGYxI4jo7dY44SgkMF1 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 04:49:16PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:34 AM Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 08:02:12PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:21 PM Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This reverts commit 7a7f094635349a7d0314364ad50bdeb770b6df4f. > > > > > > nit: some explanation and SOB would be nice. > > > > Well, it can't be actually applied. What needs to happen is that the > > networking people need to drop the commit from their tree. Some review > > from the networking people would be helpful to be sure that I didn't > > break anything in my reworking of this patch to apply after my patches. > > Are you saying you want them to revert it before it reaches mainline? > That commit landed in v6.5-rc1. ... what? It was posted on June 16th. How does it end up in rc1 on July 9th? 6.4 was June 25th. 9 days is long enough for something that's not an urgent fix to land in rc1? Networking doesn't close development at rc5/6 like most subsystem trees?