From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
david@redhat.com, vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] mm: page_alloc: drain pcp lists before oom kill
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:33:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUy1dNvbvHc6gquo@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8e16f7eb295e1843f8edaa1ae1c68325c54c896.1699104759.git.quic_charante@quicinc.com>
On Sun 05-11-23 18:20:50, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> pcp lists are drained from __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(), only if some
> progress is made in the attempt.
>
> struct page *__alloc_pages_direct_reclaim() {
> .....
> *did_some_progress = __perform_reclaim(gfp_mask, order, ac);
> if (unlikely(!(*did_some_progress)))
> goto out;
> retry:
> page = get_page_from_freelist();
> if (!page && !drained) {
> drain_all_pages(NULL);
> drained = true;
> goto retry;
> }
> out:
> }
>
> After the above, allocation attempt can fallback to
> should_reclaim_retry() to decide reclaim retries. If it too return
> false, allocation request will simply fallback to oom kill path without
> even attempting the draining of the pcp pages that might help the
> allocation attempt to succeed.
>
> VM system running with ~50MB of memory shown the below stats during OOM
> kill:
> Normal free:760kB boost:0kB min:768kB low:960kB high:1152kB
> reserved_highatomic:0KB managed:49152kB free_pcp:460kB
>
> Though in such system state OOM kill is imminent, but the current kill
> could have been delayed if the pcp is drained as pcp + free is even
> above the high watermark.
TBH I am not sure this is really worth it. Does it really reduce the
risk of the OOM in any practical situation?
> Fix this missing drain of pcp list in should_reclaim_retry() along with
> unreserving the high atomic page blocks, like it is done in
> __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim().
>
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index b91c99e..8eee292 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3857,8 +3857,10 @@ should_reclaim_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned order,
> cond_resched();
> out:
> /* Before OOM, exhaust highatomic_reserve */
> - if (!ret)
> - return unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, true);
> + drain_all_pages(NULL);
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-05 12:50 [PATCH V2 0/3] mm: page_alloc: fixes for early oom kills Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-05 12:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] mm: page_alloc: unreserve highatomic page blocks before oom Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-09 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-05 12:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] mm: page_alloc: correct high atomic reserve calculations Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-16 9:59 ` Mel Gorman
2023-11-16 12:52 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-17 16:19 ` Mel Gorman
2023-11-05 12:50 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] mm: page_alloc: drain pcp lists before oom kill Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-05 12:55 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-09 10:33 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-11-10 16:36 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-14 10:48 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-14 16:36 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-15 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-16 6:00 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2023-11-16 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-17 5:43 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2024-01-25 16:36 ` Zach O'Keefe
2024-01-26 10:47 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2024-01-26 10:57 ` Michal Hocko
2024-01-26 22:51 ` Zach O'Keefe
2024-01-29 15:04 ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-06 23:15 ` Zach O'Keefe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUy1dNvbvHc6gquo@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).