From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DD1C369A2 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 19A8B280068; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 14A52280029; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 011E7280068; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:07:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4649280029 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C683804AB for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:07:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83333280198.13.462D3E3 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79B7C0012 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=f2lDbJsP; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1744650437; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GuEk+zgRk9i9VBPLjHxyefKeet767jEh1ieDll13CJFj3UNhNjC2lqTOxVe6qF94JtSidm kj48uTV1juE7EIrIP1PtfP9UaKiM5FLDJcRI4I6t9pgPMXY802wpJNpdzg08pg3Hw+z/dy U3v3pxOw88dBgsHGlknLL2ZzE2uMRps= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=f2lDbJsP; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1744650437; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=2gZHiQsHwL/1CiwmoLxA/AKtozhwa+CHYwI4fFRQqD4=; b=WS063dQdPo6yI1Xr2/BBmGFwSQV0g/CMToC65L2z38+/IU4VgEWWkFbvQ03oj+PqB+fxyG V+AiuiYl8qqaQ0guoZ6vW6CYUCS7yRTIY3SukmKB6GAq3Dt530fsKaeffnd4Rd3Jd13eUf L4Us8LDO8QQcwjiuQbBZq27PXaqUnls= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=2gZHiQsHwL/1CiwmoLxA/AKtozhwa+CHYwI4fFRQqD4=; b=f2lDbJsPSbSJtQwgU1X7g0nVIi 9h9v2a3vo1nXbNLnxtmEOv4CV8S6WoVaQwWKxrJ3BiwSlCMRCLUUWJEBfPBk35I8j/fJqCM2RW+gY v26pydDIrLOfzzXVZI9R1W/YaSh2HNpwFWJ54oxV4kvCXdMb0TxX1fe0I6GEsv9MSx0NUtX8vZMtN Q74BWEq6jTbc57vMItbfAIKgGp5VZ1cNO3dpxdVrkvS9wLKxg43qKXmH6fEOqo2gR1sJhf5rB/QqQ VdRxKvcymsxfvvPlZ5tnA3BTxnQQLRe8qIMujwx8FI9indxcRNLc5w8jPgDvHcSvspZOHN1+YxXZC PFsXX2Bw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u4NH6-0000000Aw0B-0Ywm; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:07:12 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:07:11 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jan Kara Cc: Cabbaken Q , Kees Cook , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix comment style of `do_execveat_common()` Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E79B7C0012 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: of4y8qhwmwmc7x4z97ucoqkdqaqxjguc X-HE-Tag: 1744650435-349129 X-HE-Meta: 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 s2Csgq/v G17yazD3Bhn+u7AqN66LvBltheA== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 03:58:37PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 14-04-25 07:07:57, Cabbaken Q wrote: > > From 46fab5ecc860f26f790bec2a902a54bae58dfca7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Ruoyu Qiu > > Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:56:28 +0800 > > Subject: [PATCH] Fix comment style of `do_execveat_common()` > > > > Signed-off-by: Ruoyu Qiu > > Thanks for the patch but I think fixing one extra space in a comment isn't > really worth the effort of all the people involved in handling a patch. The correct number of spaces after a full stop is disputed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence_spacing Do not send patches to adjust the number of spaces between sentences. You are wrong to change it.