From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
mingo@kernel.org, yanjun.zhu@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/gup: remove unneeded checking in follow_page_pte()
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 11:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_Tmljh8dfhRMtCM@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407030306.411977-3-bhe@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 11:03:05AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> In __get_user_pages(), it will traverse page table and take a reference
> to the page the given user address corresponds to if GUP_GET or GUP_PIN
> is set. However, it's not supported both GUP_GET and GUP_PIN are set.
> Even though this check need be done, it should be done earlier, but not
> doing it till entering into follow_page_pte() and failed.
>
> Furthermore, this checking has been done in is_valid_gup_args() and all
> external users of __get_user_pages() will call is_valid_gup_args() to
> catch the illegal setting. We don't need to worry about internal users
> of __get_user_pages() because the gup_flags are set by MM code correctly.
>
> Here remove the checking in follow_page_pte(), and add VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()
> to catch the possible exceptional setting just in case.
>
> And also change the VM_BUG_ON to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() for checking
> (!!pages != !!(gup_flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN))) because the checking
> has been done in is_valid_gup_args() for external users of __get_user_pages().
I will also note that you changed the flags check to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE.
I guess this is fine as we have the WARN_ON_ONCE version in
is_valid_gup_args().
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-07 3:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/gup: Minor fix, cleanup and improvements Baoquan He
2025-04-07 3:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/gup: fix wrongly calculated returned value in fault_in_safe_writeable() Baoquan He
2025-04-08 9:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-04-08 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-08 9:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-08 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-08 14:59 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-07 3:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/gup: remove unneeded checking in follow_page_pte() Baoquan He
2025-04-08 9:04 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2025-04-08 9:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 3:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/gup: remove gup_fast_pgd_leaf() and clean up the relevant codes Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_Tmljh8dfhRMtCM@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).