From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2BCC4706C for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D1DDB6B0095; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CCDE76B0096; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:51:33 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B96B46B0099; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:51:33 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6F66B0095 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 12:51:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85547A03E4 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:51:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81675030066.17.A9DD4DC Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9361C0016 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=EunVCuwS; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1705168291; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=yWHH56ecZvSqek2dR3aaAVsN5PsmZUBOaXC0wFLvTP0=; b=cRzsPh7SeQ89CaLv5XzLNt6wIXgo5NpoyRSZKmZONXnhZm8FSlzQUflkJ2Y0RDJzoZhFFE RIv9W4xV1Zvo4zO07Klw6G/EJh/bZ12up2WjsnAad8AlzAJ8KFDUeZS+7h+Q7diJ49JiDf 2BDOOyxUStyjEE0aL1JSMXKJNy0cyIo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=EunVCuwS; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1705168291; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oX3duzrgn+2zWh6C1xm+fOm2NzB7CPQbRc1LRVznWZOpwhuDYGCpB1ZY+CgMfH0QuJ0kNk xVvq8xc/P/As4WNi6/sKtUSeHUSTRcQTnJIwkdMhu71ivFrnJYdq3j9lA8rBO+VXJUuz5K C1BSUNhZj9VWPQJbEGLDTiKGWP43U3Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=yWHH56ecZvSqek2dR3aaAVsN5PsmZUBOaXC0wFLvTP0=; b=EunVCuwSlLOkc5W3ErTa0HEECc 71J62WgSG7OznQu/Vnje5oPyx9/IDhKxOyGup53859Rwk9lNisgU4OcyuSXHv0c5vZdAQZ0zyJxJy ur5RJs5MnU0cErGR10Nwt7Eaf7SkBn9pEy7/NROPctiQyq2GMHfCXAm09sDEke+lp4Vg7FT60x+oc sZplddzXe8ide5fq68yHaYRijDyr7QCrYYrO5+moyuf6wLEeEsCNbQ/zbKngk/A44bIaVJ6Noy/Fq tlVPx0/cduip8oNAuqgd599FhzEPSOqwViIACCYMtZuWOrfgI0JHNBBUngMj1JBRGYfE0c9XC6B8v xN7YuGYA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rOiAB-003dzj-Tz; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:51:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:51:19 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Steve French Cc: David Howells , Greg KH , Salvatore Bonaccorso , Paulo Alcantara , Shyam Prasad N , Rohith Surabattula , Jeff Layton , Steve French , "Jitindar Singh, Suraj" , linux-mm , stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Stable , CIFS , Linux regressions mailing list Subject: Re: [Regression 6.1.y] From "cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size with copy_file_range()" Message-ID: References: <8e59220d-b0f3-4dae-afc3-36acfa6873e4@leemhuis.info> <13a70cc5-78fc-49a4-8d78-41e5479e3023@leemhuis.info> <2024011115-neatly-trout-5532@gregkh> <2162049.1705069551@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: fs4i1a881cezhhpwrkyyzx4cecc4mhq8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7A9361C0016 X-HE-Tag: 1705168291-331834 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1/jbTE8KnjvojYUtlBYyTw+y/AzxeBw6edlmVms243ejlR9nGoJGQlua3FuKuJnAIYBdX6EvYXJV8ouaxFjQU9yvtRQ1kzv4TYjN+B48CINHuGEwd/0RpLnIt7Zj2ZvQyhpH4JJq919T2F4m8SkJ9DSkVta8UtgkTak8QTz3DRVeMtFUTU7/qeir97ZuZTiJYq8/PMkl0flxz0cod6ev/GvxRecK1XGiAhZEz0heLOrdhpUlAdyXBnS91X9dhMOgJ4KzDpw2zQB9ZvMCQJLqIlbmiYOOYX5DNARxjz6QPs2G3YR1dViven+JKrYbo+AxBrw+uu9sEpXUK76TzSyxwyRddyMhG46WJFWQNjwC/EBZbgGHGdIA45oxX/dS6qsESs3JWTKIEgUkqkLD1scM6Y1hhmDIQfheoTSDZLPBpDrPEsS6YRy2n5rtf1NET3I1DIVt+VC/Zr478nSRCA1XHTVczJg2MdOam+yJ1pQ4yRywOTXgzVnf3/jPE7C1hf5q61XXENEFeNpgVrNYIYlGb23oG2EQVkBFN4hMEwSb/baaOrOU4HLBsvef+P5g5CCa8WiNNiVyGr9ei5rNe3R4wDX9jhrwz48ap5Qh2IjEh609KxWS8g6XrQ7dHY2O/g77kH3kYGPE91Y7gcwFfiI2r2jhyTQUT/w9OSb5aGIy7+fsTgu4G+AeSgEY382LKlmOg5UYTsNhPSmR1zcP61bMbJZ1GzCF1jIKLh4IASpfaicAj/7VG5fKe7daDUYs2h4q45EFCruFStLiLvyoTzWF+qfEzC/aFLCls5olEXidQWvtRuKtIPRwIoukkprPh1xIE9szie27SkeJiLST1UGLMixNksBfDk15fvIZD/Gn+Ys2vg15P9nH2ZCT43W4u94tdiUG3PjepkeyPi01ehRAeZSEEa4YakBaxD/xSIiPo81eBmUkPVo8+cxejqeyRq236nwev37Lqn 2dvaIJTB I+Ip7BdbxuU/192SRMu/rjoYGkpZFw3lbKk3E/4eJenSgLSZ+IvDGmo9yk9V+2vJg4C02Mtbm449AqjR2eJJXt3zskWkd8ILTw7d/gTDXtZ0F7b1zEmg4qMNbn1iDY1zkKYJqkG7Pgon6XRKXWeT6UHMdwVMHHOhR8Csfxr8UJSHp0WvM3hvT4mPP+p/3m1t6hIKPNMw1d2oi9Ju/PAiVT+FGBzlP3gIkCYrt5t0FAMSPnqAPLbbHGZsT9mqd9p0m0xTk X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 11:08:00AM -0600, Steve French wrote: > I thought that it was "safer" since if it was misapplied to version where > new folio rc behavior it wouldn't regress anything There are only three versions where this patch can be applied: 6.7, 6.6 and 6.1. AIUI it's a backport from 6.7, it's already applied to 6.6, and it misapplies to 6.1. So this kind of belt-and-braces approach is unnecessary.