From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/memory-failure: Remove fsdax_pgoff argument from __add_to_kill
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 03:23:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfEcJtsfe1D88yFC@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35c987d6-e78e-41df-a157-cc764245fa30@oracle.com>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 07:07:10PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> On 2/29/2024 1:20 PM, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
>
> > Unify the KSM and DAX codepaths by calculating the addr in
> > add_to_kill_fsdax() instead of telling __add_to_kill() to calculate it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> > mm/memory-failure.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > index 9349948f1abf..9356227a50bb 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> > @@ -416,21 +416,13 @@ static unsigned long dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > * not much we can do. We just print a message and ignore otherwise.
> > */
> > -#define FSDAX_INVALID_PGOFF ULONG_MAX
> > -
> > /*
> > * Schedule a process for later kill.
> > * Uses GFP_ATOMIC allocations to avoid potential recursions in the VM.
> > - *
> > - * Note: @fsdax_pgoff is used only when @p is a fsdax page and a
> > - * filesystem with a memory failure handler has claimed the
> > - * memory_failure event. In all other cases, page->index and
> > - * page->mapping are sufficient for mapping the page back to its
> > - * corresponding user virtual address.
> > */
> > static void __add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct list_head *to_kill,
> > - unsigned long ksm_addr, pgoff_t fsdax_pgoff)
> > + unsigned long addr)
> > {
> > struct to_kill *tk;
> > @@ -440,12 +432,10 @@ static void __add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
> > return;
> > }
> > - tk->addr = ksm_addr ? ksm_addr : page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
> > - if (is_zone_device_page(p)) {
> > - if (fsdax_pgoff != FSDAX_INVALID_PGOFF)
> > - tk->addr = vma_pgoff_address(fsdax_pgoff, 1, vma);
> > + tk->addr = addr ? addr : page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
> > + if (is_zone_device_page(p))
> > tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(vma, tk->addr);
>
> Not sure about the simplification. The fsdax special calculation was added by
>
> commit c36e2024957120566efd99395b5c8cc95b5175c1
> Author: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 3 13:37:29 2022 +0800
>
> mm: introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case
>
> This new function is a variant of mf_generic_kill_procs that accepts a
> file, offset pair instead of a struct to support multiple files sharing a
> DAX mapping. It is intended to be called by the file systems as part of
> the memory_failure handler after the file system performed a reverse
> mapping from the storage address to the file and file offset.
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220603053738.1218681-6-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.co
> m
> [..]
>
> @@ -354,9 +357,15 @@ static void add_to_kill(struct task_struct *tsk, struct page *p,
>
> }
>
> tk->addr = page_address_in_vma(p, vma);
>
> - if (is_zone_device_page(p))
>
> - tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(p, vma);
>
> - else
>
> + if (is_zone_device_page(p)) {
>
> + /*
>
> + * Since page->mapping is not used for fsdax, we need
>
> + * calculate the address based on the vma.
>
> + */
>
> + if (p->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
>
> + tk->addr = vma_pgoff_address(fsdax_pgoff, 1, vma);
>
> + tk->size_shift = dev_pagemap_mapping_shift(vma, tk->addr);
>
> + } else
>
> tk->size_shift = page_shift(compound_head(p));
>
> Looks like it was to deal away with this check
>
> unsignedlongpage_address_in_vma <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/page_address_in_vma>(structpage
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/page>*page
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/page>,structvm_area_struct
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/vm_area_struct>*vma
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/vma>)
> { [..]
>
> }elseif(vma <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/vma>->vm_file
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/vm_file>->f_mapping
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/f_mapping>!=folio
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/folio>->mapping
> <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/mapping>){
> return-EFAULT <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/C/ident/EFAULT>;
> }
>
> But, by providing nr=1 in vma_pgoff_address(fsdax_pgoff, 1, vma), it also avoided dealing with
>
> wrap around, which perhaps doesn't matter? perhaps noone runs fsdax on 32-bit machine?
I don't understand what you're saying is wrong with this patch.
All I'm doing (apart from the renaming of ksm_addr to addr) is moving
the vma_pgoff_address() call from __add_to_kill() to its caller.
Is there some reason this doesn't work?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-13 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-29 21:20 [PATCH 0/8] Some cleanups for memory-failure Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/memory-failure: Remove fsdax_pgoff argument from __add_to_kill Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-04 12:09 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-13 2:07 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-13 3:23 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-03-13 18:11 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-14 3:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-14 17:54 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-19 0:36 ` Dan Williams
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/memory-failure: Pass addr to __add_to_kill() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-04 12:10 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm: Return the address from page_mapped_in_vma() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-04 12:31 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-05 20:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-06 8:10 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-06 8:17 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/memory-failure: Convert shake_page() to shake_folio() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-06 9:31 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-04-08 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-08 18:31 ` Jane Chu
2024-04-10 4:01 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: Convert hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write to folio Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-08 8:33 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/memory-failure: Convert memory_failure() to use a folio Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-08 8:48 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-11 12:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-12 7:07 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-12 14:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-13 1:23 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-14 2:34 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-14 18:15 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-15 6:25 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-15 8:32 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-15 19:22 ` Jane Chu
2024-03-18 2:28 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/memory-failure: Convert hwpoison_user_mappings to take " Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-11 11:44 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-02-29 21:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/memory-failure: Add some folio conversions to unpoison_memory Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2024-03-11 11:29 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-03-01 6:28 ` [PATCH 0/8] Some cleanups for memory-failure Miaohe Lin
2024-03-01 12:40 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-04 1:55 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfEcJtsfe1D88yFC@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).