From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jiangfeng Xiao <xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, keescook@chromium.org,
haibo.li@mediatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
amergnat@baylibre.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, douzhaolei@huawei.com,
gustavoars@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
kepler.chenxin@huawei.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
nixiaoming@huawei.com, peterz@infradead.org,
wangbing6@huawei.com, wangfangpeng1@huawei.com, jannh@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, David.Laight@aculab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: unwind: improve unwinders for noreturn case
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:42:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zfs8NNlAwF3+LYZ/@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1710949294-29287-1-git-send-email-xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:41:34PM +0800, Jiangfeng Xiao wrote:
> This is an off-by-one bug which is common in unwinders,
> due to the fact that the address on the stack points
> to the return address rather than the call address.
>
> So, for example, when the last instruction of a function
> is a function call (e.g., to a noreturn function), it can
> cause the unwinder to incorrectly try to unwind from
> the function after the callee.
>
> foo:
> ...
> bl bar
> ... end of function and thus next function ...
>
> which results in LR pointing into the next function.
>
> Fixed this by subtracting 1 from frmae->pc in the call frame
> like ORC on x86 does.
>
> Refer to the unwind_next_frame function in the unwind_orc.c
This came in while I was still replying to your previous reply, so
I'm going to ignore this. Please allow at least 24 hours between
postings, and please allow discussion to finish before posting a
new version - give your reviewers adequate time to compose a reply
bearing in mind that timezones might get in the way, but also making
supper (as is the case in this instance) may cause several hour delay
in reply.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 1:39 [PATCH] usercopy: delete __noreturn from usercopy_abort Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-04 15:15 ` Jann Horn
2024-03-04 17:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-05 3:31 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-05 9:32 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-05 11:38 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-05 17:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-03-06 4:00 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-06 9:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-06 16:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-03-09 14:58 ` David Laight
2024-03-18 4:01 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-05 2:54 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-05 3:12 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 2:19 ` [PATCH] ARM: unwind: improve unwinders for noreturn case Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 2:46 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-20 3:30 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 3:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-20 3:46 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 3:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 8:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-20 15:30 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 19:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 9:44 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-21 10:22 ` David Laight
2024-03-21 11:23 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 12:07 ` David Laight
2024-03-21 12:22 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 12:57 ` David Laight
2024-03-21 13:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 14:37 ` David Laight
2024-03-21 14:56 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 15:20 ` David Laight
2024-03-21 15:33 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-21 22:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-03-22 0:08 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-22 9:24 ` David Laight
2024-03-22 9:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-03-22 12:54 ` Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-22 14:16 ` David Laight
2024-03-20 15:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Jiangfeng Xiao
2024-03-20 19:42 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zfs8NNlAwF3+LYZ/@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amergnat@baylibre.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=douzhaolei@huawei.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=haibo.li@mediatek.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kepler.chenxin@huawei.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangbing6@huawei.com \
--cc=wangfangpeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaojiangfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).