From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove meaningless calculation of zone->managed_pages in free_area_init_core()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:40:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgQ99kf4D893Y7-Y@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325145646.1044760-5-bhe@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:56:44PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Currently, in free_area_init_core(), when initialize zone's field, a
> rough value is set to zone->managed_pages. That value is calculated by
> (zone->present_pages - memmap_pages).
>
> In the meantime, add the value to nr_all_pages and nr_kernel_pages which
> represent all free pages of system (only low memory or including HIGHMEM
> memory separately). Both of them are gonna be used in
> alloc_large_system_hash().
>
> However, the rough calculation and setting of zone->managed_pages is
> meaningless because
> a) memmap pages are allocated on units of node in sparse_init() or
> alloc_node_mem_map(pgdat); The simple (zone->present_pages -
> memmap_pages) is too rough to make sense for zone;
> b) the set zone->managed_pages will be zeroed out and reset with
> acutal value in mem_init() via memblock_free_all(). Before the
> resetting, no buddy allocation request is issued.
>
> Here, remove the meaningless and complicated calculation of
> (zone->present_pages - memmap_pages), initialize zone->managed_pages as 0
> which reflect its actual value because no any page is added into buddy
> system right now. It will be reset in mem_init().
>
> And also remove the assignment of nr_all_pages and nr_kernel_pages in
> free_area_init_core(). Instead, call the newly added calc_nr_kernel_pages()
> to count up all free but not reserved memory in memblock and assign to
> nr_all_pages and nr_kernel_pages. The counting excludes memmap_pages,
> and other kernel used data, which is more accurate than old way and
> simpler, and can also cover the ppc required arch_reserved_kernel_pages()
> case.
>
> And also clean up the outdated code comment above free_area_init_core().
> And free_area_init_core() is easy to understand now, no need to add
> words to explain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/mm_init.c | 46 +++++-----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 14:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/mm_init.c: refactor free_area_init_core() Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86: remove unneeded memblock_find_dma_reserve() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove the useless dma_reserve Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/mm_init.c: add new function calc_nr_all_pages() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 13:49 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-27 15:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove meaningless calculation of zone->managed_pages in free_area_init_core() Baoquan He
2024-03-27 15:40 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-03-28 8:32 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-28 9:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 14:46 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-28 9:12 ` [PATCH v3 " Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove unneeded calc_memmap_size() Baoquan He
2024-03-27 16:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-28 1:24 ` Baoquan He
2024-03-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm/mm_init.c: remove arch_reserved_kernel_pages() Baoquan He
2024-03-26 6:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-27 15:41 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZgQ99kf4D893Y7-Y@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).