Re: [RFC v2 0/3] iommu/intel: Free empty page tables on unmaps

[Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:39:05PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.04.24 15:49, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:42 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 26.04.24 05:43, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > > > Changelog
> > > > ================================================================
> > > > v2: Use mapcount instead of refcount
> > > >       Synchronized with IOMMU Observability changes.
> > > > ================================================================
> > > > 
> > > > This series frees empty page tables on unmaps. It intends to be a
> > > > low overhead feature.
> > > > 
> > > > The read-writer lock is used to synchronize page table, but most of
> > > > time the lock is held is reader. It is held as a writer for short
> > > > period of time when unmapping a page that is bigger than the current
> > > > iova request. For all other cases this lock is read-only.
> > > > 
> > > > page->mapcount is used in order to track number of entries at each page
> > > > table.
> > > 
> > > I'm wondering if this will conflict with page_type at some point? We're
> > > already converting other page table users to ptdesc. CCing Willy.
> > 
> > Hi David,
> 
> Hi!
> 
> > 
> > This contradicts with the following comment in mm_types.h:
> >   * If your page will not be mapped to userspace, you can also use the four
> >   * bytes in the mapcount union, but you must call
> > page_mapcount_reset()
> >   * before freeing it.
> 
> I think the documentation is a bit outdated, because we now have page types
> that are: "For pages that are never mapped to userspace"
> 
> which includes
> 
> #define PG_table
> 
> (we should update that comment, because we're now also using it for hugetlb
> that can be mapped to user space, which is fine.)
> 
> Right now, using page->_mapcount would likely still be fine, as long as you
> cannot end up creating a value that would resemble a type (e.g., PG_offline
> could be bad).
> 
> But staring at users of _mapcount and page_mapcount_reset() ... you'd be
> pretty much the only user of that.
> 
> mm/zsmalloc.c calls page_mapcount_reset(), and I am not completely sure why
> ... I can see it touch page->index but not page->_mapcount.
> 
> 
> Hopefully Willy can comment.

I feel like I have to say "no" to Pasha far too often ;-(

Agreed the documentation is out of date.

I think there's a lot of space in the struct page that can be used.
These are iommu page tables, not cpu page tables, so things are a bit
different for them.  But should they be converted to use ptdesc?  Maybe!

I'd suggest putting this into the union with pt_mm and pt_frag_refcount.
I think it could even go in the union with pt_list, but I think I'd
rather see it in the pt_mm union.