From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate()
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkyMIOs76sZI5GsV@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc66eff8-4371-4685-9dd8-3dacd3744e73@csgroup.eu>
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 04:24:51PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> I had a quick look at that document and it seems to provide a good
> summary of MMU features and principles. However there are some
> theoritical information which is not fully right in practice. For
> instance when they say "Segment attributes. These fields define
> attributes common to all pages in this segment.". This is right in
> theory if you consider it from Linux page table topology point of view,
> hence what they call a segment is a PMD entry for Linux. However, in
> practice each page has its own L1 and L2 attributes and there is not
> requirement at HW level to have all L1 attributes of all pages of a
> segment the same.
Thanks for taking the time Christophe, highly appreciated.
> rlwimi = Rotate Left Word Immediate then Mask Insert. Here it rotates
> r10 by 23 bits to the left (or 9 to the right) then masks with
> _PMD_PAGE_512K and inserts it into r11.
>
> It means _PAGE_HUGE bit is copied into lower bit of PS attribute.
>
> PS takes the following values:
>
> PS = 00 ==> Small page (4k or 16k)
> PS = 01 ==> 512k page
> PS = 10 ==> Undefined
> PS = 11 ==> 8M page
I see, thanks for the explanation.
> That's a RFC, all ideas are welcome, I needed something to replace
> hugepd_populate()
The only user interested in pmd_populate() having a sz parameter
is 8xx because it will toggle _PMD_PAGE_8M in case of a 8MB mapping.
Would it be possible for 8xx to encode the 'sz' in the *pmd pointer
prior to calling down the chain? (something like as we do for PTR_ERR()).
Then pmd_populate_{kernel_}size() from 8xx, would extract it like:
unsigned long sz = PTR_SIZE(pmd)
Then we would not need all these 'sz' parameters scattered.
Can that work?
PD: Do you know a way to emulate a 8xx VM? qemu seems to not have
support support.
Thanks
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 18:59 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 11:57 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-22 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] mm: Provide page size to pte_alloc_huge() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] mm: Provide pmd to pte_leaf_size() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 9:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 10:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 17:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 0:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-21 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 10:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-24 11:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 6:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] powerpc/mm: Complement huge_pte_alloc() for all non HUGEPD setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 6:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 10:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] powerpc/64e: Remove unneeded #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500 Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 7:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-24 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] powerpc/64e: Clean up impossible setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] powerpc/e500: Remove enc field from struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:35 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 12:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-20 16:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 1:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-22 9:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-18 6:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-23 19:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 4:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-27 14:14 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 6:31 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkyMIOs76sZI5GsV@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).