From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 06:54:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlFvFk6QmyD-ieS5@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1d92dd7c390672c163ce0611600dde8cb0eaab4.1715971869.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> In order to allow leaf PMD entries, switch the PGD to 64 bits entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
I do not quite understand this change.
Are not powerE500 and power85xx two different things?
You are changing making it 64 for PPC_E500_64bits, but you are updating head_85xx.
Are they sharing this code?
Also, we would benefit from a slightly bigger changelog, explaining why
do we need this change in some more detail.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
> index 082c85cc09b1..db965d98e0ae 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-types.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ static inline unsigned long pud_val(pud_t x)
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> /* PGD level */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_E500) && defined(CONFIG_PTE_64BIT)
> +typedef struct { unsigned long long pgd; } pgd_t;
> +#else
> typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pgd_t;
> +#endif
> #define __pgd(x) ((pgd_t) { (x) })
> static inline unsigned long pgd_val(pgd_t x)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
> index 39724ff5ae1f..a305244afc9f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_85xx.S
> @@ -307,8 +307,9 @@ set_ivor:
> #ifdef CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> #define FIND_PTE \
> - rlwinm r12, r10, 13, 19, 29; /* Compute pgdir/pmd offset */ \
> - lwzx r11, r12, r11; /* Get pgd/pmd entry */ \
> + rlwinm r12, r10, 14, 18, 28; /* Compute pgdir/pmd offset */ \
> + add r12, r11, r12;
You add the offset to pgdir?
> + lwz r11, 4(r12); /* Get pgd/pmd entry */ \
What is i offset 4?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-25 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 18:59 [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/20] mm: Provide pagesize to pmd_populate() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 11:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/20] mm: Provide page size to pte_alloc_huge() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/20] mm: Provide pmd to pte_leaf_size() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 9:39 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 10:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/20] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/20] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/20] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 9:14 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-20 16:31 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 17:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-21 0:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-21 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-22 8:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/20] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 10:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-24 11:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/20] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:36 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 3:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/20] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 6:41 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] powerpc/mm: Complement huge_pte_alloc() for all non HUGEPD setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-25 6:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 10:33 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/20] powerpc/64e: Remove unneeded #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500 Christophe Leroy
2024-05-24 7:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-24 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/20] powerpc/64e: Clean up impossible setups Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/20] powerpc/e500: Remove enc field from struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:35 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/20] powerpc/85xx: Switch to 64 bits PGD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-25 4:54 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-25 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/20] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/20] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/20] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-20 12:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-20 16:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 1:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-22 9:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-22 12:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/20] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/20] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-17 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-18 6:28 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-23 19:40 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 4:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-05-27 14:14 ` Peter Xu
2024-05-24 6:31 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlFvFk6QmyD-ieS5@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).