From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel-team@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] fs: turn inode ctime fields into a single ktime_t
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:15:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoPvR39vGeluD5T2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09ad82419eb78a2f81dda5dca9caae10663a2a19.camel@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 08:09:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > corrupt timestamps like this?
> >
> > inode_set_ctime_to_ts should return an error if things are out of range.
>
> Currently it just returns the timespec64 we're setting it to (which
> makes it easy to do several assignments), so we'd need to change its
> prototype to handle this case, and fix up the callers to recognize the
> error.
>
> Alternately it may be easier to just add in a test for when
> __i_ctime == KTIME_MAX in the appropriate callers and have them error
> out. I'll have a look and see what makes sense.
The seems like a more awkward interface vs one that explicitly checks.
>
> > How do we currently catch this when it comes from userland?
> >
>
> Not sure I understand this question. ctime values should never come
> from userland. They should only ever come from the system clock.
Ah, yes, utimes only changes mtime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-27 1:00 [PATCH 00/10] fs: multigrain timestamp redux Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: turn inode ctime fields into a single ktime_t Jeff Layton
2024-07-01 22:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-02 0:22 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 9:56 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 10:19 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-02 11:42 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-02 11:44 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-07-02 12:21 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 15:58 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-03 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:18 ` Christian Brauner
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: uninline inode_get_ctime and inode_set_ctime_to_ts Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] fs: tracepoints for inode_needs_update_time " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 15:02 ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-27 15:35 ` Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] fs: add percpu counters to count fine vs. coarse timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain timestamps appropriately Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: convert " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] tmpfs: add support for " Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoPvR39vGeluD5T2@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).