From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, kees@kernel.org,
ojeda@kernel.org, wedsonaf@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: kvmalloc: align kvrealloc() with krealloc()
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:50:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zp9gtelmvzN5tfpS@tiehlicka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240722163111.4766-3-dakr@kernel.org>
On Mon 22-07-24 18:29:24, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Besides the obvious (and desired) difference between krealloc() and
> kvrealloc(), there is some inconsistency in their function signatures
> and behavior:
>
> - krealloc() frees the memory when the requested size is zero, whereas
> kvrealloc() simply returns a pointer to the existing allocation.
>
> - krealloc() behaves like kmalloc() if a NULL pointer is passed, whereas
> kvrealloc() does not accept a NULL pointer at all and, if passed,
> would fault instead.
>
> - krealloc() is self-contained, whereas kvrealloc() relies on the caller
> to provide the size of the previous allocation.
>
> Inconsistent behavior throughout allocation APIs is error prone, hence make
> kvrealloc() behave like krealloc(), which seems superior in all mentioned
> aspects.
I completely agree with this. Fortunately the number of existing callers
is small and none of them really seem to depend on the current behavior
in that aspect.
> Besides that, implementing kvrealloc() by making use of krealloc() and
> vrealloc() provides oppertunities to grow (and shrink) allocations more
> efficiently. For instance, vrealloc() can be optimized to allocate and
> map additional pages to grow the allocation or unmap and free unused
> pages to shrink the allocation.
This seems like a change that is independent on the above and should be
a patch on its own.
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index bc488f0121a7..0ff5898cc6de 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -608,6 +608,28 @@ unsigned long vm_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_mmap);
>
> +static gfp_t kmalloc_gfp_adjust(gfp_t flags, size_t size)
This seems like a generally useful helper which it is not. I would call
it something like __kvmalloc_gfp_adjust or something similar so that it is
clear that this is just a helper to adjust gfp flag for slab allocator
path
[...]
> -void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t oldsize, size_t newsize, gfp_t flags)
> +/**
> + * kvrealloc - reallocate memory; contents remain unchanged
> + * @p: object to reallocate memory for
> + * @size: the size to reallocate
> + * @flags: the flags for the page level allocator
> + *
> + * The contents of the object pointed to are preserved up to the lesser of the
> + * new and old size (__GFP_ZERO flag is effectively ignored).
> + *
> + * If @p is %NULL, kvrealloc() behaves exactly like kvmalloc(). If @size is 0
> + * and @p is not a %NULL pointer, the object pointed to is freed.
> + *
> + * Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL in case of error
> + */
> +void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> {
> - void *newp;
> + void *n;
> +
if (!size && p) {
kvfree(p);
return NULL;
}
would make this code flow slightly easier to read because the freeing
path would be shared for all compbinations IMO.
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr(p))
> + return vrealloc_noprof(p, size, flags);
> +
> + n = krealloc_noprof(p, size, kmalloc_gfp_adjust(flags, size));
> + if (!n) {
> + /* We failed to krealloc(), fall back to kvmalloc(). */
> + n = kvmalloc_noprof(size, flags);
Why don't you simply use vrealloc_noprof here?
> + if (!n)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (p) {
> + /* We already know that `p` is not a vmalloc address. */
> + memcpy(n, p, ksize(p));
> + kfree(p);
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (oldsize >= newsize)
> - return (void *)p;
> - newp = kvmalloc_noprof(newsize, flags);
> - if (!newp)
> - return NULL;
> - memcpy(newp, p, oldsize);
> - kvfree(p);
> - return newp;
> + return n;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvrealloc_noprof);
>
> --
> 2.45.2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 16:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] Align kvrealloc() with krealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: vmalloc: implement vrealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-26 14:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-26 20:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-29 19:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-30 1:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-30 12:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-30 13:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-30 13:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-30 14:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-09-02 1:36 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-02 7:04 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-02 8:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-03 3:18 ` Feng Tang
2024-09-06 7:35 ` Feng Tang
2024-07-22 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: kvmalloc: align kvrealloc() with krealloc() Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 1:43 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-23 14:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 7:50 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2024-07-23 10:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 10:55 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 11:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 13:33 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-07-23 18:53 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-26 14:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-23 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Align " Michal Hocko
2024-07-23 18:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zp9gtelmvzN5tfpS@tiehlicka \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).