From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:52:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwzNtGALCG9jUNUD@feng-clx.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2382d6e1-7719-4bf9-8a4a-1e2c32ee7c9f@suse.cz>
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 05:52:10PM +0800, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/4/24 11:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 10/4/24 08:44, Marco Elver wrote:
> >
> > I think it's commit d0a38fad51cc7 doing in __do_krealloc()
> >
> > - ks = ksize(p);
> > +
> > + s = virt_to_cache(p);
> > + orig_size = get_orig_size(s, (void *)p);
> > + ks = s->object_size;
> >
> > so for kfence objects we don't get their actual allocation size but the
> > potentially larger bucket size?
> >
> > I guess we could do:
> >
> > ks = kfence_ksize(p) ?: s->object_size;
> >
> > ?
>
> Hmm this probably is not the whole story, we also have:
>
> - memcpy(ret, kasan_reset_tag(p), ks);
> + if (orig_size)
> + memcpy(ret, kasan_reset_tag(p), orig_size);
>
> orig_size for kfence will be again s->object_size so the memcpy might be a
> (read) buffer overflow from a kfence allocation.
>
> I think get_orig_size() should perhaps return kfence_ksize(p) for kfence
> allocations, in addition to the change above.
>
> Or alternatively we don't change get_orig_size() (in a different commit) at
> all, but __do_krealloc() will have an "if is_kfence_address()" that sets
> both orig_size and ks to kfence_ksize(p) appropriately. That might be easier
> to follow.
Thanks for the suggestion!
As there were error report about the NULL slab for big kmalloc object, how
about the following code for
__do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
{
void *ret;
size_t ks = 0;
int orig_size = 0;
struct kmem_cache *s = NULL;
/* Check for double-free. */
if (likely(!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(p))) {
if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
return NULL;
ks = ksize(p);
/* Some objects have no orig_size, like big kmalloc case */
if (is_kfence_address(p)) {
orig_size = kfence_ksize(p);
} else if (virt_to_slab(p)) {
s = virt_to_cache(p);
orig_size = get_orig_size(s, (void *)p);
}
} else {
goto alloc_new;
}
/* If the object doesn't fit, allocate a bigger one */
if (new_size > ks)
goto alloc_new;
/* Zero out spare memory. */
if (want_init_on_alloc(flags)) {
kasan_disable_current();
if (orig_size && orig_size < new_size)
memset((void *)p + orig_size, 0, new_size - orig_size);
else
memset((void *)p + new_size, 0, ks - new_size);
kasan_enable_current();
}
/* Setup kmalloc redzone when needed */
if (s && slub_debug_orig_size(s) && !is_kfence_address(p)) {
set_orig_size(s, (void *)p, new_size);
if (s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE && new_size < ks)
memset_no_sanitize_memory((void *)p + new_size,
SLUB_RED_ACTIVE, ks - new_size);
}
p = kasan_krealloc((void *)p, new_size, flags);
return (void *)p;
alloc_new:
ret = kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof(new_size, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE, _RET_IP_);
if (ret && p) {
/* Disable KASAN checks as the object's redzone is accessed. */
kasan_disable_current();
memcpy(ret, kasan_reset_tag(p), orig_size ?: ks);
kasan_enable_current();
}
return ret;
}
I've run it with the reproducer of syzbot, so far the issue hasn't been
reproduced on my local machine.
Thanks,
Feng
>
> But either way means rewriting 2 commits. I think it's indeed better to drop
> the series now from -next and submit a v3.
>
> Vlastimil
>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -- Marco
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-14 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 6:45 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/kasan: Don't store metadata inside kmalloc object when slub_debug_orig_size is on Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/slub: Consider kfence case for get_orig_size() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/slub: Move krealloc() and related code to slub.c Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/slub: Improve redzone check and zeroing for krealloc() Feng Tang
2024-09-11 6:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/slub, kunit: Add testcase for krealloc redzone and zeroing Feng Tang
2024-10-02 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/slub: Improve data handling of krealloc() when orig_size is enabled Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 6:44 ` Marco Elver
2024-10-04 9:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-04 10:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 7:52 ` Feng Tang [this message]
2024-10-14 8:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 12:52 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 13:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-14 14:20 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-11-04 11:28 ` Feng Tang
2024-11-04 11:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-11-04 12:37 ` Feng Tang
2024-10-14 20:35 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwzNtGALCG9jUNUD@feng-clx.sh.intel.com \
--to=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).