From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, dev.jain@arm.com
Cc: linmiaohe@huawei.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
riel@surriel.com, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, kas@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcampbell@nvidia.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com,
gourry@gourry.net, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, mel@csn.ul.ie,
nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, pfalcato@suse.de, dave.hansen@intel.com,
tglx@kernel.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm/page_vma_mapped: use huge_ptep_get() for hugetlb
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 10:05:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1c6c3dd-8db1-4db6-b032-e350bacc4577@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629074802.42727-1-lance.yang@linux.dev>
On 6/29/26 09:48, Lance Yang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 09:25:48AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 6/29/26 08:48, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sashiko notes other places:
>>>
>>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260625112955.3254283-1-dev.jain%40arm.com
>>
>> Yeah, that looks shaky. We do seem to have a bunch of these cases, primarily
>>from pagewalk code (where some users like pagemap need the actual address).
>
> Indeed ...
>
>> I think we have two options
>>
>> 1) To prevent any (further) issues, make huge_ptep_get() always consume the
>> hstate, and let the arch code deal with aligning it. Invasive.
>
> Kinda lean toward option 1, even if it's more invasive. If we pass the
> hstate down, each arch can figure out the right addr from there.
>
>> 2) Make the arch code handle aligning without the hstate.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 30772a909aea3..303a1b74796c9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> return orig_pte;
>>
>> ncontig = find_num_contig(mm, addr, ptep, &pgsize);
>> + ptep = PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(ptep, sizeof(*ptep) * ncontig);
>> + orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < ncontig; i++, ptep++) {
>> pte_t pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>>
>> (nshift/order instead of ncontig might avoid a multiplication, but not sure if that matters in practice)
>>
>> IIUC, that's similar to what huge_ptep_get() does on ppc.
>>
>>
>> static inline pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
>> {
>> if (ptep_is_8m_pmdp(mm, addr, ptep))
>> ptep = pte_offset_kernel((pmd_t *)ptep, ALIGN_DOWN(addr, SZ_8M));
>> return ptep_get(ptep);
>> }
>>
>> I'd assume we could do the same on riscv. Besides that, I don't think any arch has cont
>> entries.
>
> AFAICT, for huge_ptep_get() the addr users are arm64 and powerpc, riscv
> doesn't really care about addr there. Looks mostly arm64-specific ...
powerpc handles it correctly in the weird "span two PMD entries" case by
aligning the PMD down.
Risc-v copied from arm64, but can simply derive the #entries from the PTE value.
it doesn't have to re-walk the table using the address.
But I think the following is required to fix, no?
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index a6d217112cf46..7e25cc13b3dba 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SVNAPOT
pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
{
- unsigned long pte_num;
+ unsigned long pte_num, pte_order;
int i;
pte_t orig_pte = ptep_get(ptep);
@@ -12,7 +13,11 @@ pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_t *ptep)
if (!pte_present(orig_pte) || !pte_napot(orig_pte))
return orig_pte;
- pte_num = napot_pte_num(napot_cont_order(orig_pte));
+ pte_order = napot_cont_order(orig_pte);
+ pte_num = napot_pte_num(pte_order);
+
+ ptep = PTR_ALIGN_DOWN(ptep, sizeof(*ptep) << pte_order);
+ orig_pte = ptep_get(ptep);
for (i = 0; i < pte_num; i++, ptep++) {
pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep);
I'd prefer (2) as a simple stable fix first.
If we do (1) on top, huge_ptep_get() on arm64 could stop walking the page table
another time.
If we pass the hstate (or vma) to set_huge_pte_at(), huge_pte_clear(),
huge_ptep_get_and_clear(), we could likely get rid of the re-walk in
num_contig_ptes() entirely and possibly just remove it.
That would probably be cleanest.
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 11:29 [PATCH 0/5] Fix incorrect access of hugetlb pte entries Dev Jain
2026-06-25 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/rmap: use huge_ptep_get() in try_to_unmap_one() Dev Jain
2026-06-26 3:17 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-26 4:03 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-26 4:16 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-25 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/rmap: use huge_ptep_get() in try_to_migrate_one() Dev Jain
2026-06-26 3:24 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-25 11:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/migrate: use huge_ptep_get() in remove_migration_pte() Dev Jain
2026-06-26 3:32 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-25 11:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/page_vma_mapped: use huge_ptep_get() for hugetlb Dev Jain
2026-06-26 2:31 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 4:06 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-26 7:48 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 9:14 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 13:23 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-26 14:10 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-26 15:26 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-26 16:46 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-27 3:54 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-06-27 7:13 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-28 5:44 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-29 6:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-29 6:48 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-29 7:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-29 7:48 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-29 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-06-29 8:22 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-29 6:59 ` Lance Yang
2026-06-25 11:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/mprotect: " Dev Jain
2026-06-26 3:40 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-26 4:08 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-26 4:21 ` Muchun Song
2026-06-26 4:42 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-25 13:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix incorrect access of hugetlb pte entries Zi Yan
2026-06-26 4:09 ` Dev Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a1c6c3dd-8db1-4db6-b032-e350bacc4577@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox