From: Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya@linux.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 18:30:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3a7a8fe-5b54-d4ea-fdbf-c4b719c684d3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaf22a62-73c7-d96b-fcd8-4437eb3d8559@amd.com>
On 6/6/22 5:39 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On 6/6/2022 5:24 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Aneesh Kumar K V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>> Can you try this change?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
>> index 7a11c387fbbc..905609260dda 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,17 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>> goto err_reg_mgid;
>> data->mgid = rc;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * This get called before the node is brought online. That
>> + * is because depending on the value of mhp_default_online_type
>> + * the kernel will online the memory along with hotplug
>> + * operation. Add the new memory tier before we try to bring
>> + * memory blocks online. Otherwise new node will get added to
>> + * the default memory tier via hotplug callbacks.
>> + */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
>> + node_set_memory_tier(numa_node, MEMORY_TIER_PMEM);
>> +#endif
>> for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
>> struct resource *res;
>> struct range range;
>> @@ -148,9 +159,6 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
>>
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, data);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
>> - node_set_memory_tier(numa_node, MEMORY_TIER_PMEM);
>> -#endif
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_request_mem:
>
> Yes, this fixes the issue for me. Thanks.
>
I might put the below change instead of the above. In the end I guess it
is better to add a NUMA node to memory tier after the node is brought
online than before even though with the current code it shouldn't matter
much.
modified drivers/dax/kmem.c
@@ -147,9 +147,15 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
}
dev_set_drvdata(dev, data);
-
+ /*
+ * node_reset_memory_tier is used here to ensure we force
+ * update the NUMA node memory tier. Depending on the value
+ * of mhp_default_online_type the kernel will online the memory
+ * blocks along with hotplug operation above. This can result in dax
+ * kmem memory NUMA node getting added to default memory tier.
+ */
#ifdef CONFIG_TIERED_MEMORY
- node_set_memory_tier(numa_node, MEMORY_TIER_PMEM);
+ node_reset_memory_tier(numa_node, MEMORY_TIER_PMEM);
#endif
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-06 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-26 21:22 RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces (v3) Wei Xu
2022-05-27 2:58 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-27 14:05 ` Hesham Almatary
2022-05-27 16:25 ` Wei Xu
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 13:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-02 6:07 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 2:49 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 3:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 5:33 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 6:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 6:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-06 7:53 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 8:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 8:52 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 9:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-08 1:24 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-08 7:16 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-08 8:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-08 8:27 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] mm/demotion: Expose per node memory tier to sysfs Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 14:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-03 8:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 14:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-06 16:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-06 16:39 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 17:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-07 14:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-08 7:18 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-08 8:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-08 8:29 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 14:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-05-30 3:35 ` [mm/demotion] 8ebccd60c2: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/compaction.c kernel test robot
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-01 6:29 ` Bharata B Rao
2022-06-01 13:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-02 6:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2022-06-03 9:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 10:11 ` Bharata B Rao
2022-06-06 10:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 11:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-06 12:09 ` Bharata B Rao
2022-06-06 13:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K V [this message]
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/7] mm/demotion: Add support to associate rank with memory tier Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 14:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-05-27 15:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-05-30 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-02 6:41 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/7] mm/demotion: Add support for removing node from demotion memory tiers Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-02 6:43 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-27 12:25 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/7] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-05-27 15:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-06-02 7:35 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-03 15:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 0:43 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 4:07 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 5:26 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 6:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2022-06-06 7:42 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 8:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-06-06 8:06 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-06 17:07 ` Yang Shi
2022-05-27 13:40 ` RFC: Memory Tiering Kernel Interfaces (v3) Aneesh Kumar K V
2022-05-27 16:30 ` Wei Xu
2022-05-29 4:31 ` Ying Huang
2022-05-30 12:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-05-31 1:57 ` Ying Huang
2022-06-07 19:25 ` Tim Chen
2022-06-08 4:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3a7a8fe-5b54-d4ea-fdbf-c4b719c684d3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hesham.almatary@huawei.com \
--cc=jvgediya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).