From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: ankita@nvidia.com
Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
will@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shahuang@redhat.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, aniketa@nvidia.com,
cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, kjaju@nvidia.com,
targupta@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, acurrid@nvidia.com,
apopple@nvidia.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, danw@nvidia.com,
zhiw@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com, udhoke@nvidia.com,
dnigam@nvidia.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
sebastianene@google.com, coltonlewis@google.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, ardb@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, gshan@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
ddutile@redhat.com, tabba@google.com, qperret@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, maobibo@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 18:09:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aCy3OwBe1HLa4O-7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250518054754.5345-2-ankita@nvidia.com>
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 05:47:50AM +0000, ankita@nvidia.com wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 2feb6c6b63af..eaac4db61828 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,15 @@ static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Determine the memory region cacheability from VMA's pgprot. This
> + * is used to set the stage 2 PTEs.
> + */
> +static unsigned long mapping_type(pgprot_t page_prot)
> +{
> + return FIELD_GET(PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK, pgprot_val(page_prot));
> +}
> +
> static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
> @@ -1612,6 +1621,10 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>
> vfio_allow_any_uc = vma->vm_flags & VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED;
>
> + if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) &&
> + mapping_type(vma->vm_page_prot) == MT_NORMAL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* Don't use the VMA after the unlock -- it may have vanished */
> vma = NULL;
>
> @@ -2207,6 +2220,12 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> +
> + /* Cacheable PFNMAP is not allowed */
> + if (mapping_type(vma->vm_page_prot) == MT_NORMAL) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
Should we capture MT_NORMAL_TAGGED as well? Presumably no driver sets
VM_MTE_ALLOWED but the same could be set about MT_NORMAL in the
vm_page_prot.
That said, we might as well invert the check, allow if MT_DEVICE_* or
MT_NORMAL_NC (the latter based on VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-18 5:47 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: arm64: Map GPU device memory as cacheable ankita
2025-05-18 5:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: arm64: Block cacheable PFNMAP mapping ankita
2025-05-20 17:09 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-05-21 2:06 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-05-18 5:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: arm64: Make stage2_has_fwb global scope ankita
2025-05-20 14:55 ` Oliver Upton
2025-05-21 0:50 ` Ankit Agrawal
2025-05-18 5:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] kvm: arm64: New memslot flag to indicate cacheable mapping ankita
2025-05-21 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-18 5:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: arm64: Allow cacheable stage 2 mapping using VMA flags ankita
2025-05-18 5:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: arm64: Expose new KVM cap for cacheable PFNMAP ankita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aCy3OwBe1HLa4O-7@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=acurrid@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aniketa@nvidia.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=danw@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dnigam@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=targupta@nvidia.com \
--cc=udhoke@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).