From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Allow built-in execution
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:19:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEwzcsDM2PPsx1h-@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c6f1cfa-7f1b-4133-ae2a-c6b1ef2d82e8@arm.com>
Hello, Dev!
>
> On 17/04/25 9:42 pm, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > This patch removes the dependency on module loading ("m")
> > for the vmalloc test suite, enabling it to be built directly
> > into the kernel, so both ("=m") and ("=y") are supported.
> >
> > Motivation:
> > - Faster debugging/testing of vmalloc code;
> > - It allows to configure the test via kernel-boot parameters.
> >
> > Configuration example:
> > test_vmalloc.nr_threads=64
> > test_vmalloc.run_test_mask=7
> > test_vmalloc.sequential_test_order=1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 3 +--
> > lib/test_vmalloc.c | 5 +++--
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index f9051ab610d54..166b9d830a85a 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -2574,8 +2574,7 @@ config TEST_BITOPS
> > config TEST_VMALLOC
> > tristate "Test module for stress/performance analysis of vmalloc allocator"
> > default n
> > - depends on MMU
> > - depends on m
> > + depends on MMU
> > help
> > This builds the "test_vmalloc" module that should be used for
> > stress and performance analysis. So, any new change for vmalloc
> > diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> > index 4ab23e5e772d0..6d65ef725d42c 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> > @@ -591,10 +591,11 @@ static void do_concurrent_test(void)
> > kvfree(tdriver);
> > }
> > -static int vmalloc_test_init(void)
> > +static int __init vmalloc_test_init(void)
> > {
> > do_concurrent_test();
> > - return -EAGAIN; /* Fail will directly unload the module */
> > + /* Fail will directly unload the module */
> > + return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) ? 0:-EAGAIN;
> > }
> > module_init(vmalloc_test_init)
>
> Hi Uladzislau,
>
> Post this patch I am seeing the following problem: while booting the kernel, this test is
> executed and a particular testcase triggers a warning splat from the kernel, then the boot
> gets stuck for 3-4 seconds, then proceeds. I am not an expert on modules so I don't know
> what happened but I am guessing that when the test fails, the delay is due to module
> unloading time...do you suggest a solution? I reverted your patch and then proceeded with
> my work, so apologies for not having the dmesg log, if you need it I'll replicate, although
> there is some subtest which has consistently been spitting out a warning on my Apple M3 Linux
> VM and I have been just ignoring it for long : )
>
This is because CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y is built-in in your case.
Therefore the tests are triggered including the ones which generates
kernel warnings, which is expectable. It takes some time to execute,
therefore you see a delay.
By default the CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC is not set. This is just for
debugging purpose. Please unset it in your kernel configuration.
It is located under:
Kernel Hacking
Kernel Testing and Coverage
Runtime Testing
Test Module for stress/performance analysis of vmalloc allocator
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 16:12 [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Allow built-in execution Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:37 ` Adrian Huang12
2025-06-13 13:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-13 14:19 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-06-13 14:23 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-13 14:37 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-06-14 10:27 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-14 15:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] MAINTAINERS: Add test_vmalloc.c to VMALLOC section Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 15:01 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-17 16:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] vmalloc: Align nr_vmalloc_pages and vmap_lazy_nr Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-04-18 13:26 ` Baoquan He
2025-04-24 13:38 ` Adrian Huang12
2025-04-18 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Replace RWSEM to SRCU for setup kernel test robot
2025-04-22 12:59 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-24 13:35 ` Adrian Huang12
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEwzcsDM2PPsx1h-@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).