From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CFEC71136 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5A3246B007B; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:51:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 553D76B0089; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:51:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 493B16B008A; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:51:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313D86B007B for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:51:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFAA161099 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:51:09 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83551421058.16.9421B4B Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D5A1C0011 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=SVRsiFsy; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1749844268; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=jXPVzY9vkuIS0lyvuKdeAbmogAFV4IaKWtXKsWkuT4Q=; b=xiFi5TeiflVgwRWlvMIeeVU9qreZ+rl4QDaMkMERXszBnf3iFYBAPaTbY3FaloXHLgyxru e1RDzzIQWegDMc7zlWmpcuwxiRQ4p/WG9cxb6tPsor5wRDoffAINeC7WWbKytkiwbxBRaK Ge6f6ahSTdhi1DMoQyMn81zRwCEzZA8= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1749844268; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Jy+e6MbJmP/uQB8QcbjXslVH/GeF9TZjl2g6lo7FebCuoY11ebL/zFTTOfw9Jf/HRYyrko iuA07C1XVwPSZWD+we4jHtzXs8y7PlBtXZhDRjKGgj2L65Zk0e1eEwZGzA+jjUpu9KEqMp WGg6y2TZUUKPW/fR5Di4rlj7X8xkqME= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=SVRsiFsy; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jXPVzY9vkuIS0lyvuKdeAbmogAFV4IaKWtXKsWkuT4Q=; b=SVRsiFsya3SZD1fO5Irkdnj79I aJG4/hs4mUuZ8qoS+YZ+3yEBnonuWJKsU9YM6P3o08porihvHoZ8lnCeFq9/VuVuKdVB2XXfPzKEe PLregmJ1fZV/U914jiXBsfMtd6OczTx5Tp7JvuDTAKYinL3EJ8HnbDWOE3uKYJF3kOQ6dfc9A/LJf ltjfT12//9LBaXnsYJUCAPgQYmFbfpUsIXBYv2TIm0iwcD+TKS6qlnVaRGCHBRJ2LoKaHgsSvp8ua NPHrVZ0g+btvRSVvLMcXfxcYd/vNCNcOZddv1L4S9PFAdjS+RR4MRYH3mXRBkO7goVEEBkWReaPew w+kzNNhg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uQAQc-0000000DK8x-23OI; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:51:06 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:51:06 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ira Weiny , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove zero_user() Message-ID: References: <20250612143443.2848197-1-willy@infradead.org> <20250613052432.GA8802@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250613052432.GA8802@lst.de> X-Stat-Signature: jheggasr3n1xbwhmjpd45m7fzrxbs1r9 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 25D5A1C0011 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1749844267-467419 X-HE-Meta: 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 Ffb9bpRp lfbTeRWCFSvwm3FAdnVKF3CyKFnY6Lr6Q7qmCwdYeei1vo2lkcTwHPri/BYhSDPjQamFmNc0UK0PJYhXuXzB/kDWmmveD8OcBbZzDaBivhmIf9MMiizmSRvy38DRPR0H4FBMsEh7u2/17PFmLUiBXk26Q/eB871LgCyRTUq34TAwl7oRbZMnsQ0cTq0+Dwve78mDI9BFkT+xdQQziLP23wbtPMlFoxW7iVBgqyKC3c285heklsjbIlDpGR3rDmVDQ1pR7qZrcWni9jgvmFmDOV6QHaK6QNOp0SfyzdFpTgtMOjr0= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:24:32AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:34:36PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > > The zero_user() API is almost unused these days. Finish the job of > > removing it. > > Both the block layer users really should use bvec based helpers. > I was planning to get to that this merge window. Can we queue up > just the other two removals for and remove zero_user after -rc1 > to reduce conflicts? If I'd known you were doing that, I wouldn't've bothered. However, Andrew's taken the patches now, so I'm inclined to leave them in. No matter which tree it gets merged through, this is a relatively easy conflict to resolve (ie just take your version). I have some more patches which build on the removal of zero_user() so it'd be nice to not hold them up.