From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Use late_initcall() if built-in for init ordering
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:42:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFqPFPmR1sZQzMS0@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5686796f.8f47.197a1310b6d.Coremail.00107082@163.com>
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 05:07:15PM +0800, David Wang wrote:
>
> At 2025-06-24 02:40:34, "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> wrote:
> >When the vmalloc test code is compiled as a built-in, use late_initcall()
> >instead of module_init() to defer a vmalloc test execution until most
> >subsystems are up and running.
> >
> >It avoids interfering with components that may not yet be initialized
> >at module_init() time. For example, there was a recent report of memory
> >profiling infrastructure not being ready early enough leading to kernel
> >crash.
> >
> >By using late_initcall() in the built-in case, we ensure the tests are
> >run at a safer point during a boot sequence.
> >
> >Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
> >Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> >Cc: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> >---
> > lib/test_vmalloc.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> >index 1b0b59549aaf1..7264781750c96 100644
> >--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> >+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> >@@ -598,7 +598,11 @@ static int __init vmalloc_test_init(void)
> > return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) ? 0:-EAGAIN;
> > }
> >
> >+#ifdef MODULE
> > module_init(vmalloc_test_init)
> >+#else
> >+late_initcall(vmalloc_test_init);
>
> >+#endif
>
>
> When MODULE defined, late_initcall is defined as module_init in ./include/linux/module.h
> I think the MODULE check here is redundant, (it is clearer though)
>
That was an idea to use MODULE, because late_initcall is designed not
for module.s It would require the comment then.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 18:40 [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Use late_initcall() if built-in for init ordering Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-06-23 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Restrict default test mask to avoid test warnings Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-06-24 9:34 ` Baoquan He
2025-06-24 8:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Use late_initcall() if built-in for init ordering Baoquan He
2025-06-24 9:07 ` David Wang
2025-06-24 11:42 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFqPFPmR1sZQzMS0@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).