linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: alexjlzheng@gmail.com, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:34:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGa_HFAupmxO_iri@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGaLLHq3pRjGlO2W@infradead.org>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:52:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +0800, alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> > 
> > In the buffer write path, iomap_set_range_uptodate() is called every
> > time iomap_end_write() is called. But if folio_test_uptodate() holds, we
> > know that all blocks in this folio are already in the uptodate state, so
> > there is no need to go deep into the critical section of state_lock to
> > execute bitmap_set().
> > 
> > Although state_lock may not have significant lock contention due to
> > folio lock, this patch at least reduces the number of instructions.
> 
> That means the uptodate bitmap is stale in that case.  That would
> only matter if we could clear the folio uptodate bit and still
> expect the page content to survive.  Which sounds dubious and I could
> not find anything relevant grepping the tree, but I'm adding the
> linux-mm list just in case.

Once a folio is uptodate, there is no route back to !uptodate without
going through the removal of the folio from the page cache.  The read()
path relies on this for example; once it has a refcount on the folio,
and has checked the uptodate bit, it will copy the contents to userspace.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250701144847.12752-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
2025-07-03 13:52 ` [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 17:34   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2025-07-07  4:08     ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-09  3:30   ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-11  7:44     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGa_HFAupmxO_iri@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).