From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
mjguzik@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
acme@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, willy@infradead.org,
raghavendra.kt@amd.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/14] perf bench mem: Move mem op parameters into a structure
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:06:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHa0tPPBcfKSK-E5@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710005926.1159009-4-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 05:59:15PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> Move benchmark function parameters in struct bench_params.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
> index b8f020379197..fb17d36a6f6c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
>
> static const char *size_str = "1MB";
> static const char *function_str = "all";
> -static int nr_loops = 1;
> +static unsigned int nr_loops = 1;
> static bool use_cycles;
> static int cycles_fd;
>
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
> OPT_STRING('f', "function", &function_str, "all",
> "Specify the function to run, \"all\" runs all available functions, \"help\" lists them"),
>
> - OPT_INTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops,
> + OPT_UINTEGER('l', "nr_loops", &nr_loops,
> "Specify the number of loops to run. (default: 1)"),
>
> OPT_BOOLEAN('c', "cycles", &use_cycles,
> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ union bench_clock {
> struct timeval tv;
> };
>
> +struct bench_params {
> + size_t size;
> + size_t size_total;
> + unsigned int nr_loops;
> +};
> +
> typedef void *(*memcpy_t)(void *, const void *, size_t);
> typedef void *(*memset_t)(void *, int, size_t);
>
> @@ -134,17 +140,19 @@ static double timeval2double(struct timeval *ts)
>
> struct bench_mem_info {
> const struct function *functions;
> - union bench_clock (*do_op)(const struct function *r, size_t size, void *src, void *dst);
> + union bench_clock (*do_op)(const struct function *r, struct bench_params *p,
> + void *src, void *dst);
> const char *const *usage;
> bool alloc_src;
> };
>
> -static void __bench_mem_function(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t size, size_t size_total)
> +static void __bench_mem_function(struct bench_mem_info *info, struct bench_params *p,
> + int r_idx)
> {
> const struct function *r = &info->functions[r_idx];
> double result_bps = 0.0;
> union bench_clock rt = { 0 };
> - void *src = NULL, *dst = zalloc(size);
> + void *src = NULL, *dst = zalloc(p->size);
>
> printf("# function '%s' (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc);
>
> @@ -152,7 +160,7 @@ static void __bench_mem_function(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t
> goto out_alloc_failed;
>
> if (info->alloc_src) {
> - src = zalloc(size);
> + src = zalloc(p->size);
> if (src == NULL)
> goto out_alloc_failed;
> }
> @@ -160,23 +168,23 @@ static void __bench_mem_function(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t
> if (bench_format == BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT)
> printf("# Copying %s bytes ...\n\n", size_str);
>
> - rt = info->do_op(r, size, src, dst);
> + rt = info->do_op(r, p, src, dst);
>
> switch (bench_format) {
> case BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT:
> if (use_cycles) {
> - printf(" %14lf cycles/byte\n", (double)rt.cycles/(double)size_total);
> + printf(" %14lf cycles/byte\n", (double)rt.cycles/(double)p->size_total);
> } else {
> - result_bps = (double)size_total/timeval2double(&rt.tv);
> + result_bps = (double)p->size_total/timeval2double(&rt.tv);
> print_bps(result_bps);
> }
> break;
>
> case BENCH_FORMAT_SIMPLE:
> if (use_cycles) {
> - printf("%lf\n", (double)rt.cycles/(double)size_total);
> + printf("%lf\n", (double)rt.cycles/(double)p->size_total);
> } else {
> - result_bps = (double)size_total/timeval2double(&rt.tv);
> + result_bps = (double)p->size_total/timeval2double(&rt.tv);
> printf("%lf\n", result_bps);
> }
> break;
> @@ -198,8 +206,7 @@ static void __bench_mem_function(struct bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t
> static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *info)
> {
> int i;
> - size_t size;
> - size_t size_total;
> + struct bench_params p = { 0 };
>
> argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, info->usage, 0);
>
> @@ -211,17 +218,17 @@ static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *
> }
> }
>
> - size = (size_t)perf_atoll((char *)size_str);
> - size_total = (size_t)size * nr_loops;
> -
> - if ((s64)size <= 0) {
> + p.nr_loops = nr_loops;
> + p.size = (size_t)perf_atoll((char *)size_str);
> + if ((s64)p.size <= 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Invalid size:%s\n", size_str);
> return 1;
> }
> + p.size_total = (size_t)p.size * p.nr_loops;
>
> if (!strncmp(function_str, "all", 3)) {
> for (i = 0; info->functions[i].name; i++)
> - __bench_mem_function(info, i, size, size_total);
> + __bench_mem_function(info, &p, i);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -240,7 +247,7 @@ static int bench_mem_common(int argc, const char **argv, struct bench_mem_info *
> return 1;
> }
>
> - __bench_mem_function(info, i, size, size_total);
> + __bench_mem_function(info, &p, i);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -257,18 +264,17 @@ static void memcpy_prefault(memcpy_t fn, size_t size, void *src, void *dst)
> fn(dst, src, size);
> }
>
> -static union bench_clock do_memcpy(const struct function *r, size_t size,
> +static union bench_clock do_memcpy(const struct function *r, struct bench_params *p,
> void *src, void *dst)
> {
> union bench_clock start, end;
> memcpy_t fn = r->fn.memcpy;
> - int i;
>
> - memcpy_prefault(fn, size, src, dst);
> + memcpy_prefault(fn, p->size, src, dst);
>
> clock_get(&start);
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
> - fn(dst, src, size);
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < p->nr_loops; ++i)
> + fn(dst, src, p->size);
> clock_get(&end);
>
> return clock_diff(&start, &end);
> @@ -305,22 +311,21 @@ int bench_mem_memcpy(int argc, const char **argv)
> return bench_mem_common(argc, argv, &info);
> }
>
> -static union bench_clock do_memset(const struct function *r, size_t size,
> +static union bench_clock do_memset(const struct function *r, struct bench_params *p,
> void *src __maybe_unused, void *dst)
> {
> union bench_clock start, end;
> memset_t fn = r->fn.memset;
> - int i;
>
> /*
> * We prefault the freshly allocated memory range here,
> * to not measure page fault overhead:
> */
> - fn(dst, -1, size);
> + fn(dst, -1, p->size);
>
> clock_get(&start);
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_loops; ++i)
> - fn(dst, i, size);
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < p->nr_loops; ++i)
> + fn(dst, i, p->size);
> clock_get(&end);
>
> return clock_diff(&start, &end);
> --
> 2.43.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 0:59 [PATCH v5 00/14] mm: folio_zero_user: clearing of page-extents Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] perf bench mem: Remove repetition around time measurement Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] perf bench mem: Defer type munging of size to float Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-16 2:17 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] perf bench mem: Move mem op parameters into a structure Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:06 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] perf bench mem: Pull out init/fini logic Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] perf bench mem: Switch from zalloc() to mmap() Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] perf bench mem: Allow mapping of hugepages Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-16 2:32 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] perf bench mem: Allow chunking on a memory region Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:17 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-16 2:34 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] perf bench mem: Refactor mem_options Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] perf bench mem: Add mmap() workloads Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-16 2:40 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] x86/mm: Simplify clear_page_* Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 11:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 17:26 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 19:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 19:24 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 19:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] x86/clear_page: Introduce clear_pages() Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] mm: add config option for clearing page-extents Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2025-07-10 16:31 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 11:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 17:25 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 19:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 19:35 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 11:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 17:32 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 19:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 19:42 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-14 20:35 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 20:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] mm: memory: support " Ankur Arora
2025-07-11 11:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-11 13:27 ` Raghavendra K T
2025-07-11 17:39 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-15 22:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 3:19 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-16 8:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 17:54 ` Ankur Arora
2025-07-10 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] x86/clear_pages: Support clearing of page-extents Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHa0tPPBcfKSK-E5@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).