From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 16:23:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHpYyZAprRjcqNTL@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xhsmh1pqdg726.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
Le Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Valentin Schneider a écrit :
> On 03/07/25 16:07, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > @@ -77,4 +77,21 @@ static inline bool cpu_is_isolated(int cpu)
> > cpuset_cpu_is_isolated(cpu);
> > }
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_WORK)
> > +extern int __isolated_task_work_queue(void);
> > +
> > +static inline int isolated_task_work_queue(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!housekeeping_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE))
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +
>
> Am I being dense or this condition the opposite of what we want? That is,
> AIUI we want isolated_task_work() to run on NOHZ_FULL/isolated CPUs'
> resume-to-userspace path, so this should bail if the current CPU
> *is* a housekeeping CPU.
Geeze!
>
> > + return __isolated_task_work_queue();
> > +}
> > +
>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-03 14:07 [PATCH 0/6 v4] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] task_work: Provide means to check if a work is queued Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Use task_work_queued() on numa_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Use task_work_queued() on cid_work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-17 16:32 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-17 17:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-18 9:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-07-18 14:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2025-07-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: Drain LRUs upon resume to userspace on nohz_full CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-03 14:24 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-03 14:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-07-03 16:12 ` Michal Hocko
2025-07-17 19:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-10 15:23 [PATCH 0/6 v3] sched/mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-10 15:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-11 10:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-04-11 22:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-04-12 5:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHpYyZAprRjcqNTL@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).