From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Dominique Martinet via B4 Relay
<devnull+asmadeus.codewreck.org@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@mbosch.me>,
Ryan Lahfa <ryan@lahfa.xyz>,
Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>,
Arnout Engelen <arnout@bzzt.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iov_iter: iterate_folioq: fix handling of offset >= folio size
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 15:39:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJyVfWKX2eSMsfrb@black.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJwj4dQ3b599qKHn@codewreck.org>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 02:34:25PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Nathan Chancellor wrote on Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:16:33PM -0700:
> > > 1 warning generated.
> >
> > I see this in -next now, should remain be zero initialized or is there
> > some other fix that is needed?
>
> A zero-initialization is fine, I sent a v2 with zero-initialization
> fixed yesterday:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250812-iot_iter_folio-v2-1-f99423309478@codewreck.org
>
> (and I'll send a v3 with the goto replaced with a bigger if later today
> as per David's request)
>
> I assume Andrew will pick it up eventually?
I hope this to happen sooner as it broke my builds too (I always do now `make W=1`
and suggest all developers should follow).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250811-iot_iter_folio-v1-1-d9c223adf93c@codewreck.org>
2025-08-11 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] iov_iter: iterate_folioq: fix handling of offset >= folio size kernel test robot
2025-08-13 5:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-08-13 5:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-08-13 13:39 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-08-13 13:45 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-08-13 13:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-14 1:14 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-08-13 23:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-08-13 13:49 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJyVfWKX2eSMsfrb@black.igk.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnout@bzzt.net \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ct@flyingcircus.io \
--cc=devnull+asmadeus.codewreck.org@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maximilian@mbosch.me \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ryan@lahfa.xyz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).